SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics
The abortion issue: pro-choice vs. anti-abortion
An SI Board Since January 2003
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
286 12 0
Emcee:  LPS5 Type:  Moderated
Introduction Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
111<The debate, for just about everyone who has a very developed opinion **, comLLCF-10/15/2008
110<Do you think that if you where a woman you would have a right to determine tLLCF-10/15/2008
109 Do you think that if you where a woman you would have a right to determine theTimF110/15/2008
108<This whole I can't decided because I'm a man theme is ridiculous. &gLLCF-10/15/2008
107<I> life that is intertwined with life... that aren't separate. </TimF-10/15/2008
106<the former your not just disagreeing with the point, your ignoring it, not aLLCF-10/14/2008
105<I> No one would argue that there isn't a 'life form' present.TimF-10/14/2008
104<That doesn't say anything either way about there being a new life form pLLCF-10/14/2008
103<I> that the mothers body, as a normal course of it's own life, "TimF-10/14/2008
102<Its not just a matter of saying it, its recognizing and describing the realiLLCF-10/14/2008
101 Its not just a matter of saying it, its recognizing and describing the realityTimF-10/14/2008
100<At (human) conception you have a new member of the species homo sapiens.>LLCF-10/14/2008
99 It is indeed totally false. At (human) conception you have a new member of TimF-10/14/2008
98<That's totally false. From conception you have a new organism. What the LLCF-10/14/2008
97<I> "Not separate from" means not separate from... at various eaTimF-10/14/2008
96<Physically connected to, does in a certain sense mean "not separate froLLCF-10/14/2008
95 Completely dependent on does not mean "not separate from". PhysicTimF-10/14/2008
94<Sorry to be blunt, but that's the way I feel.> No need to be "sLLCF210/14/2008
93Well, here is my opinion , also FWIW. you went the long way around the block tPROLIFE-10/14/2008
92Does seem like a strange thread.... here's my take on my belief in the womanLLCF210/14/2008
91Sorry, ignore this post. My kid got hold of the computer.DMaA-10/11/2008
90Message 22223117Peter Dierks-4/2/2006
89this thread has about as stupid a bunch of fools I've ever seen. God help yPROLIFE-3/31/2006
88dakotahdl-2/25/2006
87DELETEDBoca_PETE-9/13/2003
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News