SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Rockwell-Spins off Conexant (CNXT)
An SI Board Since January 1999
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
2013 83 0 CNXT
Emcee:  jas244 Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
1113 I am curious about the track record performance of Fleckenstein Fund. Do you haYiqun Xie-5/19/2000
1112 CNXT is growing this fast because they are an enabler of productivity gains....MeDroogies-5/18/2000
1111 The only important factor in increasing productivity is the desire for people tgpowell-5/18/2000
1110 That's a flaw in the productivity gauge, and one that The Economist frequMeDroogies-5/18/2000
1109 That's where you're wrong. Your productivity isn't just the amouMeDroogies-5/18/2000
1108 Michael, The thing to be concerned with here is increases/decreases in measuraDavid W. Taylor-5/18/2000
1107 Please, David, that's not a valid argument! Using a CNXT modem, a laptop (The Ox-5/18/2000
1106 >> Simple assist to your answer - has the cell phone/email/instant messagDavid W. Taylor-5/18/2000
1105 Rose, I think that unbookmarking would be a mistake. You might not like allMeDroogies-5/18/2000
1104 Rose, I agree that it SEEMS that much of the discussion isn't related to CNMeDroogies-5/18/2000
1103 The recent rise to $30 WAS a long term trend, agreed. The more recent drop dMeDroogies-5/18/2000
1102 LOL That's funny. I know in my own industry (media advertising), there MeDroogies-5/18/2000
1101 David, CNXT has acted like many others in its' sector in the market declineTechplayer-5/18/2000
1100 Why do you feel this need to control the content of a thread? The thread contengpowell-5/18/2000
1099 Apologies, Rose, but I am one of the main culprits here. When I first posted tDavid W. Taylor-5/18/2000
1098 I am in agreement with you, Rose. After a certain point, I am only interested iPashaBear-5/18/2000
1097 I'm sorry, GP, but I didn't think it worked that way, that SI was a scrRoseCampion-5/17/2000
1096 The "silent" majority do not have a vote. Frankly, I think these lastgpowell-5/17/2000
1095 Yes, PLEASE move this "discussion" amongst yourselves to ANY other thRoseCampion-5/17/2000
1094 I'll add my 2 cents here. First, we are WAY off topic by discussing macro-The Ox-5/17/2000
1093 >> David, Are you really Fleck using an alias ? >> No, just a big David W. Taylor-5/17/2000
1092 Check out the back issues of Fleckenstein. It is well worth it. He is very conDavid W. Taylor-5/17/2000
1091 David, Are you really Fleck using an alias ? R Cesar-5/17/2000
1090 Nope, I don't trust the #'s either. Not many people do. However, alMeDroogies-5/17/2000
1089 An aside: I am thoroughly enjoying the debate here MeDroogies. Try and imagineDavid W. Taylor-5/17/2000
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News