SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics
Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices
An SI Board Since September 1995
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
1593565 522 0
Emcee:  Duncan Baird Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 100 | Next 100 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
113357 Milo, <I didn't want to confuse you with Jim as you both have similar vCharles R-5/30/2000
113356 Joe Jerry Said 600w.p.w. last CC. So double your figures. By the way that postmilo_morai-5/30/2000
113355 All, Some stories of heroism in Los Alamos. >>Los Alamos has suffered aScumbria-5/30/2000
113354 <i>Interesting idea for those of you with wives, but what if your wife geKenith Lee-5/30/2000
113353 According to Yahoo, institutions own 71% (98% of float). I know this is old neEricRR-5/30/2000
113352 Re: <i>I like to explain you all how you can deal with your wife in such chic_hearne-5/30/2000
113351 Crazyoldman and thread, I like to explain you all how you can deal with your wBert Herman-5/30/2000
113350 Tim, <i>What caused you to anticipate the big run up today? What type ofScumbria-5/30/2000
113349 <i> I loaded up on June 100's this morning. They have almost doubledTimF-5/30/2000
113348 <i>That is our buddy Dan Niles who just moved to Lehman. I was hopping fEricRR-5/30/2000
113347 This article validates my previous msgs wrt semi vs China. biz.yahoo.com <xun-5/30/2000
113346 I've watched this stock for a long time, and noticed this bid > ask phenEricRR-5/30/2000
113345 Re <<LEHMAN SAYS STARTS ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES <AMD.N> AS AN OUTPERMani1-5/30/2000
113344 Thanx Charles, I didn't want to confuse you with Jim as you both have similmilo_morai-5/30/2000
113343 Again... Bid 81 Ask 80 15/16 This is starting to piss me off.EricRR-5/30/2000
113342 Re: <i>GREAT MOVE today</i> Kash & thread, I'm using strechic_hearne-5/30/2000
113341 More (not so) funny spreads... Bid 81 5/16 Ask 81 1/4 ??!!EricRR-5/30/2000
113340 Chic, GREAT MOVE today. Congrats. Clearly there is some good news coming. Ikash johal-5/30/2000
113339 We are up 10% from Friday's close!EricRR-5/30/2000
113338 Chic, <i>This morning Maria seemed to imply that Lehman wasn't covernixtox-5/30/2000
113337 Re: <i>Who did Dan Niles replace at Lehman?</i> CrazyMan, This mochic_hearne-5/30/2000
113336 Hello Charles and thread, Re: <i>Yes, it is nice. Niles helped. May be wcrazyoldman-5/30/2000
113335 Chic, I loaded up on June 100's this morning. They have almost doubled siScumbria-5/30/2000
113334 Hello Al, Re: <i>Please note that I used the word "intensify".crazyoldman-5/30/2000
113333 <It's nice to see numbers like $79 1/4, ++5 1/4.> Yes, it is nice. NCharles R-5/30/2000
113332 Milo, <You tell me your bullish and then throw me a grenade.> And I thoCharles R-5/30/2000
113331 Chuck & thread, It's nice to see numbers like $79 1/4, ++5 1/4. I thichic_hearne-5/30/2000
113330 <i>I don't believe I've ever welcomed you to the thread, Welcome!Alighieri-5/30/2000
113329 Joe, <It is a review of a 700 MHz Thunderbird (I thought Thunderbird would Charles R-5/30/2000
113328 Re: <i>We are in an irrational period. And i was worried about the closechic_hearne-5/30/2000
113327 Thread: From AOL: LEHMAN SAYS STARTS ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES <AMD.N> AS Anixtox-5/30/2000
113326 By: dhellman(1.5 Ghz T-Bird marketiing "constrained" ) Reply To: Nonemilo_morai-5/30/2000
113325 Chic I don't know if it was a partial delivery or not. Based on What I knomilo_morai-5/30/2000
113324 Re: <i>Charles your are correct. The Tools were delivered here in Portlanchic_hearne-5/30/2000
113323 Joe I'm not sure what people are paying for those wafers as they are more pmilo_morai-5/30/2000
113322 Charles your are correct. The Tools were delivered here in Portland. Milomilo_morai-5/30/2000
113321 Charles you did it again. You tell me your bullish and then throw me a grenademilo_morai-5/30/2000
113320 Nasdaq up 115Joe NYC-5/30/2000
113319 Thanks Joe, Open up over 3 points. Should be a good day. ajbajbrenner-5/30/2000
113318 It looks like trading resumed, we ar up 3 3/4 JoeJoe NYC-5/30/2000
113317 bid 67, ask 82 JoeJoe NYC-5/30/2000
113316 Trading halted, I hope its a good halt.ajbrenner-5/30/2000
113315 Hello Mani, Re: <i>It seems we are celebrating, it seems all the good necrazyoldman-5/30/2000
113314 From Bloomberg: Chips up 31% this year. World Chip Sales to Rise 31% This Yenixtox-5/30/2000
113313 Re: possible later-in-life investment strategies.. Well, if you make enough noDan3-5/30/2000
113312 OT Jozef, (continued) I have a thought... the next time an investor asks me thiAmy J-5/30/2000
113311 OT RE: "Sorry if it seems old fashioned to you." Hi Jozef, YoAmy J-5/30/2000
113310 Mani, RE: "Respect the market, it will take your heart out!" So trueAmy J-5/30/2000
113309 Ted, RE: "its not worth doing business in the SV anymore " I heard oAmy J-5/30/2000
113308 Thunderbird review (thanks to JC jc-news.com for the link: kbench.com It is aJoe NYC-5/30/2000
113307 Re: "I am bullish and in a big way. Just not as much as I used to be"Elmer-5/30/2000
113306 Re: "Which plant of INTC is already doing 130nm and on what type of wafersElmer-5/30/2000
113305 Scumbria, One thing I was thinking about is the inventory of Thunderbirds and Joe NYC-5/30/2000
113304 Scumbria, <AMD completely owns the mid-high end, and Intel is dominating thCharles R-5/30/2000
113303 Scumbria, <Depending on how clean the implementation is, it might be easierCharles R-5/30/2000
113302 Milo, <I'm confused your bearish and bullish the next post. So what arCharles R-5/30/2000
113301 Milo, <Which plant of INTC is already doing 130nm and on what type of waferCharles R-5/30/2000
113300 I visited Fry's today, and found that Athlon speed grades have risen sharplScumbria-5/30/2000
113299 Marv, Re: Van Smiths evaluation of RDRAM on Tom's site The Stream resultsJoe NYC-5/30/2000
113298 milo, <i>Just a note these copper 300mm wafers are about $20,000.00 eachJoe NYC-5/30/2000
113297 Gateway to Unveil Agreement To Buy Chips From Transmeta By NICK WINGFIELD StafRDM-5/30/2000
113296 Chuck, <i>What does it mean with respect to complexity to change a 10 stScumbria-5/30/2000
113295 <i>Some German TA showing AMD at 150 Euros by July:</i> clearstattejek-5/30/2000
113294 Chuck I'm confused your bearish and bullish the next post. So what are youmilo_morai-5/30/2000
113293 What is the size of AMD's tax loss carryforward in $/SHARE ? Eventually, tRDM-5/30/2000
113292 Chuck that seems odd as I heard INTC just took some delivery of some Tools withmilo_morai-5/30/2000
113291 <b> WAY OT...PROCEED AT YOUR OWN RISK</B> <i>Pravin re <&tejek-5/30/2000
113290 Scumbria, <If so, they would restructure the pipe, possibly adding more staCharles R-5/29/2000
113289 Steve, <New iNteL pricing up heise.de > Thanks for posting. Isn'tCharles R-5/29/2000
113288 Cirrus, <AMD 760MP to support dual processors> 2 DDRs and 2 ThunderbirdCharles R-5/29/2000
113287 << I don't think I'd own any AMD without Dresdan. >> Reallthat_crazy_doug-5/29/2000
113286 Hans didn't actually say for certain that the stages would be eliminated, bEricRR-5/29/2000
113285 Mani, <566 MHz and 600 MHz Celeron are listed at higher price in www.pricewCharles R-5/29/2000
113284 Gopher Broke, <If Dresden is ramping fast then AMD will need to sell in larCharles R-5/29/2000
113283 Ratbert, <i>something about those stages not being balanced</i> IScumbria-5/29/2000
113282 <i>Why would AMD be eliminating pipe stages, when they have to compete agEricRR-5/29/2000
113281 Goutama, <A release of 1.5GHz thunderbirds can create chaos at Intel. > Charles R-5/29/2000
113280 I'm always upbeat Steve, but How can things continue to go so well. I woumilo_morai-5/29/2000
113279 Joe, <The author (Innsbruck) confirms in a follow up post:> I guess youCharles R-5/29/2000
113278 Ratbert, <i>He believes that the "scan" and "align 1"Scumbria-5/29/2000
113277 It was in the diagram on page six. It shows the Athlon pipeline starting: fetcEricRR-5/29/2000
113276 hmaly, <Chuck, maybe there is another big reason, Dell. Maybe this will be Charles R-5/29/2000
113275 I believe it was in his pdf. I'll check for the page number.EricRR-5/29/2000
113274 Ratbert, <i>perhaps removing some pipeline stages (according to Hans) anScumbria-5/29/2000
113273 <i>AMD has always stated there would be new cores. Austin K75 is dead.<EricRR-5/29/2000
113272 fwiw All, New iNteL pricing up heise.de stevesteve harris-5/29/2000
113271 Cirrus, Re: 760, 760MP, 770 I was under the impression that 760MP was the samJoe NYC-5/29/2000
113270 RatbertRyand, re:new cores AMD has always stated there would be new cores. Aussteve harris-5/29/2000
113269 Steve, I agree with you. I also have been very critical about this 1.5 GHz stuMani1-5/29/2000
113268 Re: I don't think I'd own any AMD without Dresdan. Don't sell AustDan3-5/29/2000
113267 Are Tbird and Duron mustang cores? Did anyone notice the inference in this disEricRR-5/29/2000
113266 Re: <i>IMHO, Dresden is the key</i> CrazyMan, Agreed. I don'chic_hearne-5/29/2000
113265 Hello Chic, Re: <i>I'm completely sold on copper. It's good for crazyoldman-5/29/2000
113264 milo, This innsbruck fellow sounds about as flaky as Yousef is. He appears to steve harris-5/29/2000
113263 Re: <i>How strong was the rumor, and have you heard anything since? Did ychic_hearne-5/29/2000
113262 RE: Rambus Requiem - RDRAM Fails Bandwidth Tests tomshardware.com Last paragrRayMarv-5/29/2000
113261 Chic Re..<<<<<<b>There was no specific chip mentionedhmaly-5/29/2000
113260 Hello Elmer, Re: <i>This is an extremely long time to bring a fab onlinecrazyoldman-5/29/2000
113259 Re: "Jerry also said of building a new fab plant: "It's like haviElmer-5/29/2000
113258 Hello Chic, Re: <i>Can one of you Germans translate this?</i> I acrazyoldman-5/29/2000
Previous 100 | Next 100 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):