Martha Stewart -- Scourge or Scapegoat | Stock Discussion Forums

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech
Martha Stewart -- Scourge or Scapegoat

An SI Board Since February 2003

Posts	SubjectMarks	Bans	Symbol
165	12	0	MSO

Emcee: Jeffrey S. Mitchell	Type: Unmoderated

Introduction Market Data Compact

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):

Reply	Message Preview	From	Recs	Posted
115	Here's another (quite unflattering) perspective. Ouch. ===== SHE LIED HER	Jeffrey S. Mitchell	-	3/8/2004
114	While I do think that the gov't pursuit of martha was not in the public'	Labrador	-	3/8/2004
113	Hi Tippet, you wrote: <i> "I still say she did nothing criminal. The	ChrisJP	-	3/8/2004
112	but what did she testify to -- except that Martha changed the phone log? Do inn	yard_man	-	3/8/2004
111	Martha Stewart's Appeal Won't Be Easy washingtonpost.com Lawyers May	stockman_scott	-	3/8/2004
110	A Very Shaky Case Succeeds cbsnews.com	stockman_scott	-	3/8/2004
109	As I've said in other posts, it was Martha's assistant's testimony t	ChrisJP	-	3/7/2004
108	no there never was any insider selling charges -- what was tossed out had to do	yard_man	-	3/7/2004
107	Jeff, Watching Dateline here... As I recall, the intire deal here is Martha maki	Gary E	-	3/7/2004
106	<i>that last witness was clearly put into the case for nothing other than	Jeffrey S. Mitchell	-	3/7/2004
105	to simply know that Waskal was selling is technically no insider information --	yard_man	-	3/7/2004
104	>>She Refused to Plead Guilty to a Felony<< yes -- it makes no sens	yard_man	-	3/7/2004
103	<b>Prosecutors Offered Martha Stewart a Deal Last April: Cop To One Count	Glenn Petersen	-	3/7/2004
102	Ok Jeff, I got off course, and a little carried away.	John J. O`Reilly	-	3/7/2004
101	<i>If your broker tells you insider info be sure and sit there like a dumm	Jeffrey S. Mitchell	-	3/7/2004
100	Shameless Grub Post, lol.	ChrisJP	-	3/7/2004
99	Hi Salem's Hex -- what I like about you ..... I how you make up your own fa	ChrisJP	-	3/7/2004
98	A solution to her problem, being caught between a rock and a hard place after he	John J. O`Reilly	-	3/6/2004
97	Fall of the house of Stewart telegraph.co.uk	stockman_scott	-	3/6/2004
96	<i>There'll be more pressure than ever on all of 'em to go after t	Jeffrey S. Mitchell	-	3/6/2004
95	The prosecutor announced after the verdict that this should send a message to al	SalemsHex	-	3/6/2004
94	bcanada, do you think the Martha verdict would be weakened (i.e. not send the pr	Jeffrey S. Mitchell	-	3/6/2004
93	The NY Times has a good story on this called "Another Wall St. Case of Conf	Jeffrey S. Mitchell	-	3/6/2004
92	bcanada, your comments about a broker's oath and the integrity of the stock	Jeffrey S. Mitchell	-	3/6/2004
91	I forget, how many billions did Enron cost investors? How many folks at Enron lo	SalemsHex	-	3/6/2004

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):