Silicon Investor - User Site Discussion - Generally Unmodera

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes
Silicon Investor - User Site Discussion - Generally Unmodera

An SI Board Since November 2013

Posts	SubjectMarks	Bans
1604	78	0

Emcee: SI (no user)	Type: Moderated

Introduction Compact

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):

Reply	Message Preview	From	Recs	Posted
1154	If three "malcontents" were the source of all the angst on the New Fea	1Coffeehound	4	9/9/2014
1153	Can anyone guess which forum is SI ?? If a new user was checking out investment	1Coffeehound	-	9/9/2014
1152	Following are timings of the thread topics from four separate investment chat fo	TEDennis	-	9/8/2014
1151	It just happened again. On a "MARKETS" display, right above the botto	TEDennis	1	9/8/2014
1150	I forgot to mention ... The uncompleted rendering of the bottom ad on the page	TEDennis	2	9/8/2014
1149	The tab I mentioned in my prior post that still had a spinning clock STILL has a	TEDennis	2	9/8/2014
1148	Your reference to "retro" made me think of "retro rockets".	TEDennis	-	9/8/2014
1147	I've decided to embrace the logos and the graphics. It's so retro. Ret	Siber	-	9/8/2014
1146	The illusive SI Craig has returned to SI. He actually made a post! Message 297	Siber	-	9/8/2014
1145	Here's an idea ... Since it appears the primary purpose of SI admin is to p	TEDennis	4	9/8/2014
1144	Hey ... that's great news !!! There were only THREE waits after your second	TEDennis	-	9/8/2014
1143	Click..........wait..........wait..........wait..........wait..........click....	1Coffeehound	2	9/8/2014
1142	I don't know. Last week, it didn't seem like it would be a real problem.	Sam	-	9/8/2014
1141	An IP attorney on this site could answer, if it is a technique to catch and stop	Sr K	-	9/8/2014
1140	<i>Can someone explain to me why SI thinks we NEED a logo? </i> I	Sam	3	9/7/2014
1139	re: creating a recognizable and consistent look SI doesn't need a "rec	TEDennis	2	9/7/2014
1138	Hmmm ... interesting. There seems to be some confusion even within those who mak	TEDennis	-	9/7/2014
1137	1) it appears that a logo is required, but it's really not It doesn't	Kevin Podsiadlik	-	9/7/2014
1136	I wonder what Apple was thinking in ~2007 when they standardized the size and sh	Sr K	2	9/7/2014
1135	Response time: Step 1: Get a SubjectMarks listing. 47 seconds later, I finally	TEDennis	2	9/7/2014
1134	Big Sac sighting (first in over a year): Message 29703307	greg s	-	9/7/2014
1133	Knight sac(rifice) Food for discussion en.wikipedia.org Sacrifice (chess) Fr	greg s	-	9/7/2014
1132	But don't you think it's a shame that this board is even necessary? It	1Coffeehound	3	9/6/2014
1131	Responding to those issues would require Dmitry to admit he was wrong, and is st	TEDennis	3	9/5/2014
1130	51 recs now-- Message 29695608 24 recs Message 29698451 18 recs Dmitry, it wo	Sam	1	9/5/2014

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):