SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Microsoft - The <b>Evil</b> empire
An SI Board Since October 1997
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
1600 18 0 MSFT
Emcee:  Columbo Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
1175 <i>Most Windows apps halt when you click down on the mouse and don't Robert Winchell-6/2/1998
1174 It was expedias fault, as near as I can tell. Additionally, their organizationDragonfly-6/2/1998
1173 <i>I used expedia this weekend. The only reason I used it is the car rentRobert Winchell-6/2/1998
1172 I used expedia this weekend. The only reason I used it is the car rental compaDragonfly-6/2/1998
1171 <i>BTW - my personal opinion is that Bill will either be shot or kidnappeRobert Winchell-6/2/1998
1170 <i> There has to be money behind it, and a lot of it.</i> There isDragonfly-6/2/1998
1169 <i>Which is why Apache is still the dominant web server?</i> ActuDragonfly-6/2/1998
1168 <i>Why would MS want to gain leverage over internet content?</i> Dragonfly-6/2/1998
1167 Microsoft <b>is</b> evil. While it may not have evil intent, it sqDragonfly-6/2/1998
1166 <i>Excellent analogy! Are you kidding? </i> No. The browser is aDragonfly-6/2/1998
1165 There's no <i> will </i> about it! He already is a content provDavid LaSalle-6/2/1998
1164 The reason MS wants us to use their browser is simply because the internet is HJudd-6/2/1998
1163 Just to confirm, you answered your own argument. not profitable, YES. not inteKal-6/2/1998
1162 The reason the Browser <b>shouldn't</b> be a part of the OS is Judd-6/2/1998
1161 <i>you answered your own argument. To clarify it for you: Gates WILL becoRobert Winchell-6/2/1998
1160 <i>Yes, all other CEOs except microsoft's. I'm not aware of any tRobert Winchell-6/2/1998
1159 <i>Why shouldn't it? well, I can't answer every rhetoric of your Robert Winchell-6/2/1998
1158 <i>Yes, but that's for content providers. Plus, Gate's iKal-6/2/1998
1157 Why shouldn't it? well, I can't answer every rhetoric of your argumentKal-6/2/1998
1156 <i>becuase of the amount of dineros involved in content, as has been provRobert Winchell-6/2/1998
1155 becuase of the amount of dineros involved in content, as has been proven by huKal-6/2/1998
1154 <i>the browser needn't be part of the OS.</i> It doesn't &Robert Winchell-6/2/1998
1153 i can't hook up a TV, not yet, I'll have to see how this strategy wouldKal-6/2/1998
1152 <i>Its an important thing to note that the browser was a viable applicatiRobert Winchell-6/2/1998
1151 Well then, I like to argue too (honestly) The bottom line of my arguments againKal-6/2/1998
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News