SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy
Starpoint Gold
An SI Board Since May 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
2378 19 0 STS
Emcee:  The Commander Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
1178 TO ALL: The company news release stated that they had until June 5th to come upPaul Kindel-4/12/1997
1177 One Question!!!! Does the Board of Directors and Officers of STS have Liabilitsaul mikaliukas-4/12/1997
1176 Hello Richard: Yes indeed your questions are valid and directed to the prDonald McRobb-4/12/1997
1175 Chad, There have been a number of valid questions posted here that need to be Bohdan-4/12/1997
1174 Unanswered questions: I posted several questions following the release in post Richard Vannevel-4/12/1997
1173 Thanks, Richard, for re-posting the release. The deal did not fall through becJ. Plantinga-4/12/1997
1172 Adam, They told me Friday that the Angolans were probably going to mine YetwenChad Beemer-4/12/1997
1171 Hi everyone I have been following this thread now for sometime.It appears thatpaulo-4/12/1997
1170 <<Adam. the question now is who is getting Yetwene? I too have lost a smaAdam Levar-4/12/1997
1169 Starpoint Goldfields Inc - Angolan agreement amended Starpoint Goldfields InRichard Vannevel-4/12/1997
1168 Adam. the question now is who is getting Yetwene? I too have lost a small fortuBrian Wilson-4/12/1997
1167 TO ALL: two things. 1) This company is now worth less than a shell at the samPaul Kindel-4/12/1997
1166 <<They talked to KRT Diamond Works, and tons of other firms and companiesAdam Levar-4/12/1997
1165 Hold on? Buy in? 3 Words: Why, Why, Why??? A lot of irrational thinking going J. Plantinga-4/12/1997
1164 We've all been sucked in to a internet play. Let's face it, we've bBaddpitt-4/12/1997
1163 Dan, I probably know less than you do re: STS MGT but I seem to recall they lojocko-4/11/1997
1162 To all, We were expecting the next BRE-X, i think we all got it. The 1997 verRichard-4/11/1997
1161 Hi Don, I've got to agree with you. The time has come to put emotions asidPaul JS-4/11/1997
1160 Dan, You might say at this point in time Dan we are stuck with STS. We have toChad Beemer-4/11/1997
1159 I agree with those of you who say don't sell!! It was a gamble and yes someStan Treacher-4/11/1997
1158 Hello Mark: Your blurb is politically correct but may be financially wrong. SomDonald McRobb-4/11/1997
1157 Mark, My insight says read Mark's words very carefully. I am not selling!!!jocko-4/11/1997
1156 Michael,Don and All, You guys raise some interesting questions which I believeChad Beemer-4/11/1997
1155 Hello Don and All: I guess the big question is now do we still have a viable CMark Shantz-4/11/1997
1154 Hello Michael: If STS's angolan diamond assets were as good as they seemed Donald McRobb-4/11/1997
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):