SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes
How to best deal with KOOKS at this web site
An SI Board Since March 1997
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
1894 6 0
Emcee:  Iceberg Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
119 Ice, after reading your post I think maybe we should kick it around a little beStan Walker-4/7/1997
118 >everything used to excess loses effectiveness Yes, Gottfried...perhaps oneIceberg-4/7/1997
117 >Now what, summarize and promote? Stan, Exactly. I think we'reIceberg-4/7/1997
116 ICE, well, there's more evidence supporting my theory that stocks going souGottfried-4/7/1997
115 Iceberg, your proposals for dealing with type II and type III posters are what Stan Walker-4/7/1997
114 Linda, I didn't laugh until the <b>second</b> time I saw it. SeGottfried-4/7/1997
113 ICE, I take that for agreement. <b>Thanks</b> But everything used tGottfried-4/7/1997
112 Herb, <b>thanks</b> for the help.Gottfried-4/7/1997
111 GM, OT, the bold thing is actually pretty funny-- I know it's not a joke, bLinda Pearson-4/6/1997
110 >the webmaster was prompt to cleaning it up Herb, J.C. losing his cool Iceberg-4/6/1997
109 Gottfried,<i> Re:</i><b> PS: how do you turn bold off? <Herb Fuller-4/6/1997
108 >PS: how do you turn bold off? Gottfried, With posts such as that one Iceberg-4/6/1997
107 Ice . Re:>>>A type III poster is one who is obviously dangerous to comHerb Fuller-4/6/1997
106 Jeff, are the SI rules in the following post accurate and current? exchange200Iceberg-4/6/1997
105 Herb, I can only guess why you didn't post this on the IOM thread. :) HereGottfried-4/6/1997
104 To all: Here's a proposal for dealing with type III posters A type III poIceberg-4/6/1997
103 >Sign me up. Herb, You're on. Now, while waiting for other commentIceberg-4/6/1997
102 Ice, Re:>>> A response containing facts, data, references or other appHerb Fuller-4/6/1997
101 To All: Here's a proposal for responding to type II posters Type II posteIceberg-4/6/1997
100 Gottfried, Re: Rocky's post-------- --------------------------------------Herb Fuller-4/6/1997
99 Ice, people just don't LISTEN! (I use 'listen' even though we read)Gottfried-4/3/1997
98 Ice, you said >>It would be interesting to get the opinion of a sociologiGottfried-4/3/1997
97 >I wouldn't be surprised if there had been animal studies using rats,wheIceberg-4/3/1997
96 >Some may object to word 'kook' Gottfried, You may be right heIceberg-4/3/1997
95 Linda, re >> I thought the note was pretty good! <<. I wish I coulGottfried-4/3/1997
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):