SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics
Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices
An SI Board Since September 1995
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
1595843 521 0
Emcee:  Duncan Baird Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 100 | Next 100 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
121857In other words you are saying that AMD broke its recent uptrend and that has leaMonty Lenard-8/6/2000
121856Trade in .00001's and more gaps will appear. You believe what you want BilMonty Lenard-8/6/2000
121855<i>This means it is pure and simple manipulation so the manipulatorAlighieri-8/6/2000
121854Bill, RE:"Seriously, I have never found any credible explanation for any asJim McMannis-8/6/2000
121853jim, No snipes at montey, but at TA. Will Intel fill that huge gap at .0042?. ThBill Jackson-8/6/2000
121852Monty Re....<<<<<b>I have never seen a "formal" sthmaly-8/6/2000
121851Bill, RE:"Ted, It should be clear by now that TA is nothing more or less thJim McMannis-8/6/2000
121850Ted, It should be clear by now that TA is nothing more or less than a religious Bill Jackson-8/6/2000
121849<i>The chart is the "facts". The charts are the "Money Traitejek-8/6/2000
121848Monty, Re: <i>I think sometimes certain TA works because so many people &qmanfredhasler-8/6/2000
121847OK. The crooks in the pits control the mechanism so I will have to defer to themMonty Lenard-8/6/2000
121846"May be your hint of a 90+%chance does not have anything to do with probabiMonty Lenard-8/6/2000
121845Monty, Re: <i>I think what you are saying is that many phonemenon cannot bmanfredhasler-8/6/2000
121844Monty, in this case if you don't mind: <i>... It does not HAVE TO butmanfredhasler-8/6/2000
121843Manfred, this is a very poignant statement. You are right on target here. "Monty Lenard-8/6/2000
121842Hi Manfred, I have to disagree with that statement. MontyMonty Lenard-8/6/2000
121841Monty, <i>Re: The chart is the "facts".</i> A very poignamanfredhasler-8/6/2000
121840Paul, re:"Does this mean you won't call people NAZI's anymore ?&qukash johal-8/5/2000
121839I am trying to see what factual analysis has led you to that conclusion. The chMonty Lenard-8/5/2000
121838<i>tejek, you keep using the words "HAD", "HAS", etc. tejek-8/5/2000
121837Manfred, read this that I just posted to tejek. Message 14169731 MontyMonty Lenard-8/5/2000
121836An exhaustion gap nor anyother gaps are necessary. Continuation gaps take much Monty Lenard-8/5/2000
121835Bert <i>As the stock price indicates, I have not been yet, It's the ctejek-8/5/2000
121834Ted, As the stock price indicates, I have not been yet, It's the coming weeBert Herman-8/5/2000
121833<i>BTW, here is one link on gaps. It does not go into great detail as it itejek-8/5/2000
121832Monty <i>Re: It does not go into great detail as it is just what it says &manfredhasler-8/5/2000
121831Kash - Re: "Perhaps you can convince Paul/Elmer/Yousef to a peace agreementPaul Engel-8/5/2000
121830Then I must have come into the conversation mid stream Fraid that is what happeMonty Lenard-8/5/2000
121829<i>I did not come over here and say that. I said that on another thread antejek-8/5/2000
121828"you stated strongly that you were shorting AMD 'cause it had to fill tMonty Lenard-8/5/2000
121827Dan, <i>1.16? Wasn't it supposed to be 1.1314159? </i> OvercloScumbria-8/5/2000
121826<i>BTW, I would not say my opinions are "unique" necessarily ...tejek-8/5/2000
121825<i>If that's the case I have to apologize JC for jumping on my horse ttejek-8/5/2000
1218241.16? Wasn't it supposed to be 1.1314159?Daniel Schuh-8/5/2000
121823I forgot one thing. <i>Did they have to raise the voltage to 1.8V, drop tScumbria-8/5/2000
121822Scumbria, re: <i>Did they have to raise the voltage to 1.8V, drop the tempaburner-8/5/2000
121821Nope. Still think it is going to 40ish. "You might want to pull your shorMonty Lenard-8/5/2000
121820Stribe, <i>Duron 600 overclocked to 1.16 Ghz</i> Did they have to Scumbria-8/5/2000
121819Monty, It appears that you have done a "Full Monty" in front of the tScumbria-8/5/2000
121818Milo, <i>Intel executives recommending single-data-rate SDRAMs for the coScumbria-8/5/2000
121817The topic for the weekend? <i>Re: Barrons of today from Message 14168426 manfredhasler-8/5/2000
121816Eric, in plain english for a non computer HARDWARE geek are you saying that RDRAMonty Lenard-8/5/2000
121815"Perhaps it would be better to put the vendetta aside and provide your persMonty Lenard-8/5/2000
121814Eric, If that's the case I have to apologize JC for jumping on my horse to Bert Herman-8/5/2000
121813Bert-- Have you spent time in RAMBO's jungle? I believe JC was pointing out Eric K.-8/5/2000
121812<i>. I can't believe you people haven't accepted that SDRAM will bBert Herman-8/5/2000
121811<font color=pink>Monty-- Perhaps it would be better to put the vendetta asEric K.-8/5/2000
121810Elmer - RE: "Looks like the GigaMine is now in volume!" The 1GHz PIICirruslvr-8/5/2000
121809<what made you crawl out of you hole....clueless.> I was going to ask youAli Chen-8/5/2000
121808Re: IBM AMD PCs! Where'd they go? >>Canada? That's funny. RemindTony Viola-8/4/2000
121807Re: IBM AMD PCs! Where'd they go? Canada? commerce.www.ibm.comDan3-8/4/2000
121806Me desperate, I think not. I shorted AMD the FIRST time above 90. I have actuaMonty Lenard-8/4/2000
121805Monty, You are sounding desperate. I do hope you didn't make the mistake oGopher Broke-8/4/2000
121804Dan, ><i>That's been there for months</i> (PIII 1 GHz) You pTony Viola-8/4/2000
121803Re: Looks like the GigaMine is now in volume! The noose tightens...... For Q4, Dan3-8/4/2000
121802Dan3, Elmer saw them at the last IDF. That was 6 months ago, at least! He had Daniel Schuh-8/4/2000
121801Re: Same day delivery! That's been there for months. It's been a bit Dan3-8/4/2000
121800John, Tony posted this on the Intel thread: commerce.www.ibm.com "Get speElmer-8/4/2000
121799<font color=darkorange><b>At IDF, Intel to address SDRAM use in nextmilo_morai-8/4/2000
121798AMD Announces Completion of Sale of its Communication Products Division SUNNYVtejek-8/4/2000
121797Well what made you crawl out of you hole....clueless. Paybacks are hell and iMonty Lenard-8/4/2000
121796Milo, re: <i>It's weird to see AMD at 62 5/8 and INTC at 62 9/16</Road Walker-8/4/2000
121795I did sell some AMD this morning but bought back at 61 11/16. This is likely toRob S.-8/4/2000
121794<font color=orange>It's weird to see AMD at 62 5/8 and INTC at 62 9/16milo_morai-8/4/2000
121793<font color=red>Scuimbria... Looks like AMD and MU are moving in <b>richard surckla-8/4/2000
121792Duron 600 overclocked to 1.16 Ghz overclockzone.com Courtesy of JCstribe30-8/4/2000
121791Chip stocks' early gains fizzle By Janet Haney, CBS.MarketWatch.com Last Utejek-8/4/2000
121790Thanks for the earnings estimate revision. This is looking very good. one probRob S.-8/4/2000
121789<i>One year ago last Friday, the S&P 500 was selling at 34.62 times trtejek-8/4/2000
121788Ted, Thanks for posting the interesting BW article. A point of reference: One Road Walker-8/4/2000
121787<font color=green><b>Latest revision to AMD's EPS estimates showtejek-8/4/2000
121786Business Week: August 14, 2000 Corporate Scoreboard Still Flying with a Full Tatejek-8/4/2000
121785UP1000 board picture with function hints, Cartrige open, Cartrige closed Promilo_morai-8/4/2000
121784Niceguy, Got a buy signal on AMD last night! YogiYogizuna-8/4/2000
121783<font color=darkred><b>You’ll Get a Slot You Like "B"</milo_morai-8/4/2000
121782Amy-- Re: What was your investment strategy? I'm not really sure I had a &Eric K.-8/4/2000
121781API jobs for Athlons zeus2.alpha-processor.commilo_morai-8/4/2000
121780Hi Eric, RE: "I'm still up a little over 1100%" That's awesomAmy J-8/4/2000
121779Re: "TWY does IBM own Samsung?..."...Samsung’s Alpha EV68 chip yields.THE WATSONYOUTH-8/3/2000
121778HDLN 8/3/00 - 10:23 PM... Announcer: Virtually all internet traffic travels acromilo_morai-8/3/2000
1217771100Mhz Duron overclockzone.commilo_morai-8/3/2000
121776Here's la link to some real AMD Fans! Enjoy the positive reads... news.cnet.greg nus-8/3/2000
121775TWY does IBM own Samsung?..."...Samsung’s Alpha EV68 chip yields...." milo_morai-8/3/2000
121774Re: "The new Compaq supercomputer will consist of 682 Compaq servers, each THE WATSONYOUTH-8/3/2000
121773<font color=darkorange><b>Compaq wins bids for academic supercomputemilo_morai-8/3/2000
121772Monty Re..<<<<<b> Speaking of humor, if you want to see humorhmaly-8/3/2000
121771hmaly-- I think this discussion has run its course. -EricEric K.-8/3/2000
121770Eric,, RE...<<<<<<b>Anyway, I don't want to engage in hmaly-8/3/2000
121769Ted Re...<<<<<b> So, Harry, what's the secret behind yourhmaly-8/3/2000
121768<i>Ted, if you want to be a better investor, learn how to follow the institejek-8/3/2000
121767<i>I'll have to apologize to her. That is not as easy as it sounds - atejek-8/3/2000
121766<i>Nice comeback for AMD today. I haven't looked at the interday, was tejek-8/3/2000
121765<i>These are just some examples. Please don't try to make yourself outtejek-8/3/2000
121764Monty, Re: This is not kindergarden nor a mutual admiration society. If those poGary Ng-8/3/2000
121763Er, as a sometime participant in that thread, I'd say it could use new bloodDaniel Schuh-8/3/2000
121762Re: "It's just painful to read fluff over and over again, even if it isElmer-8/3/2000
121761Hi Elmer-- I really wasn't posting to compare our performances. I don't Eric K.-8/3/2000
121760I suggest you and jc and all the others who are so easily offended visit this thMonty Lenard-8/3/2000
121759(but thanks for backing me up, doug, I think that's sweet) Well give him aMonty Lenard-8/3/2000
121758You know if I did not think you were serious in what you wrote I would have thouMonty Lenard-8/3/2000
Previous 100 | Next 100 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):