SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
S3 (A LONGER TERM PERSPECTIVE)
An SI Board Since January 1997
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
14577 37 0 SIII
Emcee:  stock talk Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
12377 Syn, you make good points regarding "others" benefiting from the STB/Calvin Scott-12/15/1998
12376 Strong trading this morning. Good volume. I think we're holding nicely oRob-12/15/1998
12375 The 3Dfx/STB deal must be a massive shock to the industry. It completely altersSynapsid-12/14/1998
12374 Hi Jerry, This is the most recent review I've seen that mentions the driveDon Earl-12/14/1998
12373 Hi Don, Well, I wasn't bored. Just curious. As far as entertainment, tJerryP-12/14/1998
12372 Don't count on a STB Velocity 3200 with a Savage chip. 3DFX is buying STBImark doubiago-12/14/1998
12371 Any stock, no matter how good or bad, will not change in price very much unlesdick williams-12/13/1998
12370 Hi Don, I agree that this stock is dead money for a while. It might be good tostockroach-12/12/1998
12369 Hi Jerry, I'm lurking here now and then, but since they hired another overParker Benchley-12/12/1998
12368 Hi Jerry, If you get really bored there's always the Yahoo thread: quote.yDon Earl-12/12/1998
12367 Even though I'm not posting, I still hold this stock since I first bought iGhassan I. Ghandour-12/11/1998
12366 Still here Jerry. Watching....waiting & waiting some more... Sandman-12/11/1998
12365 I sort of feel like the plague has hit and I'm the only one left on the plaJerryP-12/11/1998
12364 Hi All, FWIW: To: Toni Wheeler (3285 ) From: James Strauss Tuesday, Dec 8 19Toni Wheeler-12/9/1998
12363 Hi Jerry, Point taken. I suppose I should be a little less negative about the Don Earl-12/8/1998
12362 My guess is going to 0.18um will not put them that much ahead because it's patrick tang-12/8/1998
12361 So, patrick, <i>HOWEVER, Savage at 0.25um is roughly competing w/TNT, G2JerryP-12/8/1998
12360 Hi Calvin, MW, et al, A previous post mentioned Potashner had only been on theDon Earl-12/8/1998
12359 Smaller um = higher performance + no heat problems. HOWEVER, Savage at 0.25um patrick tang-12/8/1998
12358 There was news about the .18 micron technology on Nov. 30 . I got it off a GateToolManInc-12/8/1998
12357 Hi Don; If I get some time later I'll fill you in as best I can but in theMW-12/8/1998
12356 This is huge news. Perhaps the technicians on the board would like to explain Rob-12/8/1998
12355 SANTA CLARA, Calif.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Dec. 8, 1998--While competitors remaRandy-12/8/1998
12354 Don: >>I'm also a bit surprised at the lack of PR coming out of PotasCalvin Scott-12/7/1998
12353 Hi MW, If you have some free time in the near future, I'd be interested inDon Earl-12/7/1998
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News