SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
FORE Inc.
An SI Board Since February 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
12559 26 0 FORE
Emcee:  Pascal A. Mons Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
12434 Just walked in the door and got the call myself. He wanted to know if I would LakesideTrader-5/19/1999
12433 Len, Here it is, taken from the Technology Briefs of WSJ today's edition: Sibaris-5/19/1999
12432 I came home today to find a message on my answering machine from someone represschlep-5/19/1999
12431 The was some Wall Street Journal story concerning FORE...anyone know what it waElmer Flugum-5/18/1999
12430 You are absolutely right! Boris Reynov-5/18/1999
12429 I don't agree either! :-) I don't like having to give Bill any more thaLakesideTrader-5/18/1999
12428 <<$35 cash is always better than $35 in another company's shares>&Boris Reynov-5/18/1999
12427 Trevor, Re:<i>$35 cash is always better than $35 in another company'Riskmgmt-5/18/1999
12426 Ray, The option grants imply a serious conflict of interest was present. HoTrevor Goodchild-5/18/1999
12425 Jas, will the stock continue to trade after the tender is complete, like XYLN dgbh-5/18/1999
12424 Worth reposting. biz.yahoo.com Joe P.J. Plesha-5/18/1999
12423 <i>Management took care of themselves and their employees </i> I jas cooper-5/18/1999
12422 -OT- PERI WIND are two that can potentially fly pretty high biz.yahoo.cojach-5/18/1999
12421 Len: I think that we should not jump to conclusions here. Yes, it did say thatRiskmgmt-5/17/1999
12420 The wording [of the Tender] said they <i> had</i> come up with a hiElmer Flugum-5/17/1999
12419 On the other hand, the o t h e r telecommunication company could have come upJoseph A. Aboaf-5/17/1999
12418 This quasi-ethical option play makes me believe that the class-action suit in pElmer Flugum-5/17/1999
12417 Len, Management took care of themselves and their employees because every perTrevor Goodchild-5/17/1999
12416 Good question, I'd guess that COMS as most immediate (maybe next few weeksMorris Catt-5/15/1999
12415 As most feel lawsuits are out for me. Injunctions and other recourse are alwaysJ. Plesha-5/15/1999
12414 As you already know there is a shareholder lawsuit in the process as we speak. Elmer Flugum-5/15/1999
12413 Ok, MAC - what's the next takeover??? <ggggg> LakesideTrader-5/15/1999
12412 Article in WSJ is somewhat dated. Details ALL taken directly from 4/30/99 OffeMorris Catt-5/15/1999
12411 all is relative.. If you have one share, it's -ten dollar, 10 shares -100 djach-5/15/1999
12410 Yes but I always assumed management was just stupid not dishonest. :-( Joe P. J. Plesha-5/14/1999
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News