SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes
The Justa & Lars Honors Bob Brinker Investment Club
An SI Board Since August 1998
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
15132 69 0
Emcee:  Justa Werkenstiff Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
13132 Great post! I agree 100% Some of the hot stocks are at correction depths neverKirk ©-4/12/2000
13131 ..and from the FED rubber chicken circuit -Larry Meyer: including..: "TheWally Mastroly-4/12/2000
13130 But what is IT, in the "it will come up." I think this will be a goodLone Star-4/12/2000
13129 sentiment bulls 56.9 bears 26.7 bulls/(bulls+bears)=68.06 up from 65.28 last marc ultra-4/12/2000
13128 "April is the cruelest month." Probably not, though. In 1998, theHank Stamper-4/12/2000
13127 Same experience with me.....everyone I know says "it will come up, don'rsie-4/12/2000
13126 Re NASDAQ: This market is simply amazing to watch at this point. From my safeHank Stamper-4/12/2000
13125 Dipy, thats a hoot. As an AMAT investor, I get nervous when someone rolls out tLone Star-4/12/2000
13124 RE: "Listeners are used to just measuring the market on the S&P."Investor2-4/12/2000
13123 I2: I don't know if SFE's decision to walk away from the BTB was the prJusta Werkenstiff-4/12/2000
13122 Chris, The relevance of the beginning of the year is that it is the point of tAlan Bell-4/11/2000
13121 "B2B NOW MEANS BOOM TO BUST By JOSEPH GALLIVAN B2B may already be goinInvestor2-4/11/2000
13120 Does anyone know why Bob refers to how his investment strategy did over the 1stChris J. Horne-4/11/2000
13119 <i>Come to think of it, though, the P/E ratio is typically not very helpfsea_biscuit-4/11/2000
13118 T: The book only states raw probabilities. You must be an institutional subscriJusta Werkenstiff-4/11/2000
13117 I see what you mean. Your P/E of 26 for "future earnings" is much loInvestor2-4/11/2000
13116 The last I saw on AMAT, which has undewrgone a number of upwards revisions receLone Star-4/11/2000
13115 Re: "At least for the quality stocks in the Naz (AMAT, TXN, etc.) the forwInvestor2-4/11/2000
13114 Exactly, plus many stocks might still be integrating out losses or crummy quartKirk ©-4/11/2000
13113 Plus, these are trailing P/E's. At least for the quality stocks in the Naz Lone Star-4/11/2000
13112 Justa <<d: I use the Book of Small Indices published by Birinyi AssociatT Bowl-4/11/2000
13111 Graphs like that investech.com remind me of 11th century England right after soKirk ©-4/11/2000
13110 Noah beat me to it, but it was Stephen Stills. It's somewhat reassuring (fAllan Harris-4/11/2000
13109 Great graph on volatility of the nasdaq at this site: investech.com Richrsie-4/11/2000
13108 Carl: Re: "I've been unable to get a quote on JBID. Don't tell me Justa Werkenstiff-4/11/2000
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News