Summit Technology (BEAM) | Stock Discussion Forums

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Biotech / Medical
Summit Technology (BEAM)

An SI Board Since March 1996

Posts	SubjectMarks	Bans	Symbol
1386	16	0	BEAM

Emcee: Keith Fauci	Type: Unmoderated

Introduction Market Data Compact

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):

Reply	Message Preview	From	Recs	Posted
1336	BEAM: it seems that you know quite a lot about BEAM. Would you comment on the c	kha vu	-	8/18/1999
1335	The rest of the story . Researchers and developers for VISX break through with	Bernard	-	8/16/1999
1334	Hi, Just thought I would point out that what you are referring to is not an upg	Bernie Goldberg	-	8/15/1999
1333	beam upgraded today. chas biz.yahoo.com	Charles Crabtree	-	8/13/1999
1332	Thanks 2Mars$ . I just saw that on :Clearstaion......http://www.clearstation.co	Bernard	-	8/12/1999
1331	(BSNS WIRE) Summit Technology, Inc. Announces Pricing of Offering Summit Te	2MAR$	-	8/12/1999
1330	Now , what do you think this present idle at high volume is all about ? I '	Bernard	-	8/12/1999
1329	I can assure you that I seriously doubt if my being silly had anything to do wi	Carl R.	-	8/11/1999
1328	Hey Carl , who sats your wife can't or anybody but you can wear night visio	Bernard	-	8/11/1999
1327	I guess if wearing glasses seemed like a disadvantage I might feel differently.	Carl R.	-	8/9/1999
1326	Funny, while I know it is surgery it just never seemed like that to me.Laser Vi	Paul Kelly	-	8/9/1999
1325	Let me say that I've worn glasses for years, and I'm used to them. Ther	Carl R.	-	8/9/1999
1324	All the fuss is about money and position . The fact is that the technology that	Bernard	-	8/9/1999
1323	I have no position in BEAM at all. I've just been watching the company for	Carl R.	-	8/9/1999
1322	Carl; "why would anyone buy a secondary" Good point. I've neve	Ken W	-	8/9/1999
1321	As an example of a company that made an "appropriate" secondary, look	Carl R.	-	8/9/1999
1320	I'll have to correct myself on the stock offering. I was incorrect in sayi	Ken W	-	8/9/1999
1319	Carl: "the stock falls for a while during the secondary and for awhile th	Ken W	-	8/8/1999
1318	Secondaries can mean that a company is in trouble, cash wise. They could also	Carl R.	-	8/8/1999
1317	Mike, Here is a novel idea if you don't know much about the company....rea	Ken W	-	8/8/1999
1316	HV, Thanks for the info. I don't know much about the company, I just might	Mike Hermann	-	8/6/1999
1315	In response to your question, "Any ideas about the secondary offering?&qu	HerbVic	-	8/6/1999
1314	Any ideas about the secondary offering?	Mike Hermann	-	8/6/1999
1313	I would tend to concur. 20 is the new minimum support level, though we may onl	HerbVic	-	7/28/1999
1312	That's the most intelligent comment I have seen on this thread recently. T	Bernie Goldberg	-	7/28/1999

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):