SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends
Moomin Valley (formerly Troll-free Zone)
An SI Board Since August 2001
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
2852 27 0 QQQQ
Emcee:  Moominoid Type:  Moderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
1377The model in the simulation already gained more this year than all last year.Moominoid-7/26/2006
1376That is great, since we may already are in a bear market now<g> sell the RealMuLan-7/26/2006
1375Yes my model performs best in bear markets and the very high returns in that perMoominoid-7/26/2006
1374I wonder whether Quantum was in HK to bid on HK$ devaluation and then only got hRealMuLan-7/25/2006
1373What Quantum did evolved over time. The 1990s (pound in 1992) were pretty late iMoominoid-7/25/2006
1372>>No actually I think after this week we head down to a low in late AugustRealMuLan-7/25/2006
1371<i> 30-40% return for how long? 10-20 years? That seems a little off?<gMoominoid-7/25/2006
137030-40% return for how long? 10-20 years? That seems a little off?<g> HedgRealMuLan-7/25/2006
1369Renaissance Technologies and SAC have returns of around 30% after their massive Moominoid-7/25/2006
1368>>The backtest produces returns beyond those from any hedge fund with publRealMuLan-7/25/2006
1367ttrader.comclinto eastwood-6/18/2006
1366Being dogmatic either way is not good for making money. That's why I originaMoominoid-6/16/2006
1365,.. true,... open minds,... into possibilities,... often leads to profits,... CharlieChina-6/16/2006
1364Your longer term goals make sense and may be conservative ;) I'm following yMoominoid-6/16/2006
1363,... E-waves work,... but,... how they are interpreted are often incorrect,... sCharlieChina-6/16/2006
1362Ive bookmarked this thread,... and watching,... thanks for your invitation,...CharlieChina-6/16/2006
1361On an E-Wave basis the initial decline from the May highs is complete: stockchaMoominoid-6/15/2006
1360<i>Acampora and everyone was saying that TA was doomed</i> Yah I reshades-6/7/2006
1359Remember when Prudential fired Acampora and everyone was saying that TA was doomMoominoid-6/7/2006
1358What I would like to come up with is an objective measure of determining the dirMoominoid-5/30/2006
1357<i>how to best adapt to it </i> In what respect?Moominoid-5/30/2006
1356I'm not sure I understand the intricacies - in fact, I'm sure I don'skinowski-5/30/2006
1355<i>You don't seem to wnat to recognize that people can do something dishades-5/29/2006
1354Message 22495297Moominoid-5/29/2006
1353I think it is very interesting actually. But then you make statements like thisMoominoid-5/24/2006
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):