SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes
THE SLIGHTLY MODERATED BOXING RING
An SI Board Since February 2002
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
21057 16 0
Emcee:  Peter Dierks Type:  Moderated
Introduction Compact
Previous 100 | Next 100 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
14133Thanks for reminding me about my Clinton and Gore dolls. I stuck pins in them dLazarus_Long-6/4/2002
14132An election is not an IQ test. We are not electing simply intellect. Words likLazarus_Long-6/4/2002
14131I was very struck by these lines from your first link. Both because I hadn'tE-6/4/2002
14130<<Nixon lusted after power, Carter lusted in his heart, and Clinton lustedIsh-6/4/2002
14129Nixon lusted after power, Carter lusted in his heart, and Clinton lusted.Original Mad Dog-6/4/2002
14128My brother (who is a liberal leaning sort) said that he would rather have a PresOriginal Mad Dog-6/4/2002
14127<<I think that Nixon, Carter, Reagan, his father, and Clinton were brighteIsh-6/4/2002
14126Time to go. Take care, all.......Neocon-6/4/2002
14125We agree. I do think that the elder Bush has been underrated by a lot of people,Neocon-6/4/2002
14124<<Do you seriously take the position that there's nothing deficient inIsh-6/4/2002
14123<i>I think that Nixon, Carter, Reagan, his father, and Clinton were brightOriginal Mad Dog-6/4/2002
14122I think he is bright, knowledgeable about business and politics, articulate in aNeocon-6/4/2002
14121I have spoken with several people who know Bush personally, and have worked withThe Philosopher-6/4/2002
14120<i> Do you seriously take the position that there's nothing deficient TimF-6/4/2002
14119Look at this: Bush dismisses the report by his own executive branch, whose leadE-6/4/2002
14118Putting the one-liners about liberals aside: Do you seriously take the position E-6/4/2002
14117I think his real problem is that he's not a liberal.Lazarus_Long-6/4/2002
14116<i>Thanks for the thoughtful reply. Maybe someone else knowledgeable aboutjttmab-6/4/2002
14115<i>If third world countries had an easier time selling goods in the US theLazarus_Long-6/4/2002
14114And I have a birthday every day just to make sure I don't miss it!Lazarus_Long-6/4/2002
14113<i>Thanks Karen</i> No, thank you. I was beginning to choke on cynLane3-6/4/2002
14112LOL!! Good point.Lazarus_Long-6/4/2002
14111<i>Two posters on SI had different perceptions, discussed it a bit, and cajttmab-6/4/2002
14110<i> Character. That is certainly a word never used when referring to ClintThe Philosopher-6/4/2002
14109<i> What "artificial trade barriers" are you referring to? </TimF-6/4/2002
14108A lot of that money is built up in family owned businesses. The owner or the wTimF-6/4/2002
14107I don't think he has any more of a problem than you or I. JLAjlallen-6/4/2002
14106Seriously: What do you think his problem is with language and concepts and knowlE-6/4/2002
14105I found this amusing and thought you might, as well. White House Notebook At tLane3-6/4/2002
14104People who think Bush is "dumb" are really the dumb ones.... JLAjlallen-6/4/2002
14103I just saw you post that on Beanies and have already clipped it into my books-toLane3-6/4/2002
14102Message 17553283 That's a mention of a fine, easy-reading book about evolutE-6/4/2002
14101<i>I think the number of the Churches may be the key. </i> Do you rLane3-6/4/2002
14100My husband uses the "God moves in mysterious ways" line, with the addeE-6/4/2002
14099<i>I assume internal inconsistencies aren't counted as defects. I wondjttmab-6/4/2002
14098<i>'No defects' was the point he made. He was speaking from a 'E-6/4/2002
14097<i>I see you are good at "you're one too" arguments.</i&gjttmab-6/4/2002
14096<i>Hamas is one of its foreign branches. NSDAP is a defunct branch.</i&jttmab-6/4/2002
14095<i>About 11 at the moment. I appear to be your favorite target at the momejttmab-6/4/2002
14094<i>I see you are good at "you're one too" arguments.</i&gjttmab-6/4/2002
14093<i>Is 'articleis' Latin? Good strategy. If you can't do anythijttmab-6/4/2002
14092<i>EVERY organization claims to be law abiding and moral, doesn't it? jttmab-6/4/2002
14091I think the number of the Churches may be the key. In Cleveland. The Czechs werejttmab-6/4/2002
14090<i>Did the Pope really said RC had no "defects," or is that parajttmab-6/4/2002
14089Aw yes, but you can hide your own Easter Eggs!sandintoes-6/4/2002
14088Character. That is certainly a word never used when referring to Clinton.Lazarus_Long-6/4/2002
14087But she assumed that somehow Bush's flop meant the global warming theory'Lazarus_Long-6/4/2002
14086I assume nothing about global warming based on his opinions. No opinion of his iE-6/4/2002
14085Who told you that? The prayers that count are <i>not</i> determined E-6/4/2002
14084You should have 'splained it to me like that before! Now I understand! I haE-6/4/2002
14083But if he's the idiot you describe, why assume he's right now? Why notLazarus_Long-6/3/2002
14082What "artificial trade barriers" are you referring to? So we, the AmeLazarus_Long-6/3/2002
14081ClintonGoreClintonGoreClintonGoreClintonGoreClintonGoreClintonGoreClintonGoreCliLazarus_Long-6/3/2002
14080<i>IF THE MAN IS AS DUMB AS YOU HAVE LONG CLAIMED, WHY DO YOU PAY ANY ATTEDayuhan-6/3/2002
14079For you this is an obsession. For us, this is simply history. We have a much mLazarus_Long-6/3/2002
14078<i> I'm convinced that whoever was making decisions would have been moDayuhan-6/3/2002
14077We RWers don't take excuses, you know. We'll pull those fillings out ofLazarus_Long-6/3/2002
14076When you say "WHY DO YOU PAY ANY ATTENTION TO HIS OPINIONS?" do you meE-6/3/2002
14075Oh dear, you've relapsed.E-6/3/2002
14074I admit he's a great improvement on the oiliness of Slick Willie, but still:Lazarus_Long-6/3/2002
14073More will presumably be known about who knew what when, though I'm personallE-6/3/2002
14072I think you are simply jealous because Bush is not nearly as comical as ClintonGLazarus_Long-6/3/2002
14071Well, they should be grateful. Unless they always wanted to live in Alaska.Lazarus_Long-6/3/2002
14070<i> the theory is that we lent them money, now WE have to pay it back? &lDayuhan-6/3/2002
14069Even more so. You quickly forget what hurts.Lazarus_Long-6/3/2002
14068I would hate to mention ClintonGore when it is irrelevant to the discussion at hE-6/3/2002
14067A wise position. Burning would generate telltale traces of smoke, which might bDayuhan-6/3/2002
14066I have no doubt that warning signs before 9/11 were overlooked, and that complacDayuhan-6/3/2002
14065I believe the president's position is that we may scrap the constitution as E-6/3/2002
14064See? This is why we RWers should run the country. We're smarter and sneakiLazarus_Long-6/3/2002
14063No. Liberal dogma requires that it must use large amounts of oil.Lazarus_Long-6/3/2002
14062The umbrella concept may never fly, though, due to the limitations of faith-baseDayuhan-6/3/2002
14061I have a note exempting me from tests because of my fillings.E-6/3/2002
14060<i>ClintonGoreClintonGoreClintonGoreClintonGore</i> You really seem Lazarus_Long-6/3/2002
14059But I thought Cheney and Rumsfeld and unknown wise others were advising him so E-6/3/2002
14058My inside sources, which are close to your sources but more knowledgeable, say tE-6/3/2002
14057So the theory is that we lent them money, now WE have to pay it back?Lazarus_Long-6/3/2002
14056<i>Then to counteract the nuclear winter, we burn lots of oil.</i> Tom C-6/3/2002
14055<i>And how is this ClintonGore's fault, again, you having had to make Lazarus_Long-6/3/2002
14054Have you posted this op ed piece by conservative commentator William Safire? FroE-6/3/2002
14053ROTFLMAO!!!!! I think you got it! That's the plot! Then to counteract theLazarus_Long-6/3/2002
14052You demolib pinheads have been telling us for YEARS how stupid Bush is. So he cLazarus_Long-6/3/2002
14051<i>My inside sources suggest ...</i> My sources suggest that a &quoTom C-6/3/2002
14050My inside sources suggest that the device under development is not a gigantic oiDayuhan-6/3/2002
14049I don't think he believes in astrology. Rather, I think that, like so many,Lane3-6/3/2002
14048In your old age?sandintoes-6/3/2002
14047<i>Services such as ....?</i> The consultants that develop the projDayuhan-6/3/2002
14046<i>His plan is probably to build a humongous oil-powered refrigerator to cE-6/3/2002
14045Maybe he thought you said astronomy. Had you ever heard before that he believed E-6/3/2002
14044Ah, so you, also, choose the course of loyalty to the former Bush instead of to E-6/3/2002
14043Taxes were already paid on all money that comes to those who have worked for it;E-6/3/2002
14042<i>So we tax poor Americans to pay rich banks?</i> The whole issue Dayuhan-6/3/2002
14041Message 17552047 Two minds....E-6/3/2002
14040<i>Maybe I should get him an SI membership. He'd fit right in. </i&Lazarus_Long-6/3/2002
14039Services such as ....?Lazarus_Long-6/3/2002
14038No, you got it entirely wrong. I blame his<i> acknowledgement</i> oLazarus_Long-6/3/2002
14037If it is Bush's current position that it is <b> obvious </b> thaTimF-6/3/2002
14036<i>ClintonGoreClintonGoreClintonGoreClinton</i> E, I thought of youLane3-6/3/2002
14035Personally, I think the warming is now in Bush's brain. Probably the resultLazarus_Long-6/3/2002
14034So your choice is to cling to Bush's former position and disagree with his cE-6/3/2002
Previous 100 | Next 100 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News