Should NY Times Be Prosecuted for Classified Leaks

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics
Should NY Times Be Prosecuted for Classified Leaks

An SI Board Since June 2006

Posts	SubjectMarks	Bans
178	5	0

Emcee: jlallen	Type: Moderated

Introduction Compact

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):

Reply	Message Preview	From	Recs	Posted
153	It's not an issue except to partisan extremists. It has been repeatedly poi	Lazarus_Long	-	7/6/2006
152	Run Hillary in 2008. Please. PLEASE. You promise? <i>I thought you were a	Lazarus_Long	-	7/6/2006
151	Its not a partisan issue -- except to namecallers like you.	Mao II	-	7/6/2006
150	Yeah, Laz...lock em' up. Are you going to say the same thing when Hillary i	RMF	-	7/6/2006
149	ANY analogy that demolishes your ignorant refusal to accept that there must be l	Lazarus_Long	-	7/5/2006
148	should we give the Chineses our launch codes and destinations???	longnshort	-	7/5/2006
147	Aux Etats-Unis, l'une des activités préférées des milita	Mao II	-	7/5/2006
146	That's a bad analogy. Are you comparing publication of the fact of SWIFT mon	Mao II	-	7/5/2006
145	<i>The Times would have published no matter who was president.</i>	jlallen	-	7/5/2006
144	Would the Times publication have made a difference? Castro wasn't entirely	Lazarus_Long	-	7/5/2006
143	But Kennedy did not cancel. The Times had the story. If they had run the story,	Mao II	-	7/5/2006
142	I said no such thing. I said if Kennedy cancelled US air cover, he should have	Lazarus_Long	-	7/5/2006
141	So you agree that the times should have published? Or are you just interested in	Mao II	-	7/5/2006
140	Because the New York Times says so By Jonah Goldberg Wednesday, July 5, 2006 Ac	Peter Dierks	-	7/5/2006
139	And selling ads. Don't forget selling ads. The nobility on the other side	Lazarus_Long	-	7/5/2006
138	Kennedy would. He was the mongoloid who cancelled US air cover and ordered the	Lazarus_Long	-	7/5/2006
137	You're the one whom started the stupidity, dolt.	Lazarus_Long	-	7/5/2006
136	Considering who I was talking to, I was. :-)	Lazarus_Long	-	7/5/2006
135	The Times would have published no matter who was president. There are many many	Mao II	-	7/5/2006
134	There has to be a balance....its not that easy to determine where the line is...	jlallen	-	7/5/2006
133	As Justice Hugo Black wrote, “The guarding of military and diplomatic secrets at	Mao II	-	7/5/2006
132	Please...play nice...<g>	jlallen	-	7/5/2006
131	Play nice....	jlallen	-	7/5/2006
130	Where you're involved, quality is not; nor is discourse, for that matter.	Mao II	-	7/5/2006
129	The Times has been tabloid since the William Kennedy Smith rape trial. I remembe	Tom Clarke	-	7/4/2006

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):