SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Fonix:Voice Recognition Product (FONX)
An SI Board Since May 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
3347 45 0 FONX
Emcee:  Dave Rebok Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
1597 One of the things I find most difficult about fonix is having an positive opiniMark Cox-2/10/1998
1596 Marc, At this time I agree with your points. Three and four are especially saed doell-2/9/1998
1595 Give me a break.Jerry String-2/8/1998
1594 I recently visited Fonix for the third time. For what it's worth, I offer Fairways9-2/8/1998
1593 >>The following is a key for Fonix, IMHO.<< biz.yahoo.com I agreeed doell-2/6/1998
1592 To Everyone: Mark this day down. The following is a key for Fonix, IMHO. biz.Dave Walp-2/6/1998
1591 Karl, Anything I could tell your would be based on pure speculation on my partFairways9-1/26/1998
1590 Ok, Siemens is now cropping up in many of the DSP/ADSL discussions I follow. Thstuddog-1/25/1998
1589 <<Chip sets are intended to be developed first. Chip sets are considered Fairways9-1/23/1998
1588 New Chairman's corner: fonix.com I still look at fonix as a potential homerstuddog-1/21/1998
1587 Just wanted to see if this site was still working since there has been no news Mark Cox-1/21/1998
1586 Welcome back, Frank. Sure, Siemens (and OGI) engineers will be working on thisDr. Bob-1/16/1998
1585 Hi Bob and everyone else, Just came back from my vacation and of course am frufranco nuvoloni-1/16/1998
1584 Parx, Here's why I think the questions of whether the new hires are additiDr. Bob-1/16/1998
1583 <<John Harris, I have to say sometimes you come across as a bit too smug&john harris-1/16/1998
1582 Bob: Sorry I never responded to your post (regarding the hiring of software enRhino-1/16/1998
1581 Bob, I think its just speculation on my part, but I think its very difficult toMark Cox-1/16/1998
1580 Getting kind of peckish around here again. Back to the fundamentals. I posed Dr. Bob-1/15/1998
1579 <<It's a put up or shut up kinda game for fonix and you, John.>>john harris-1/15/1998
1578 John, I am interested as well. If you know what you say you know when you saed doell-1/15/1998
1577 <<I've looked at it and we may as well talk politics or religion.>john harris-1/15/1998
1576 john harris, Let me clarify things, you say: <<the fonix relationship wiRandall E Westberg-1/15/1998
1575 <<Kind of a bold statement Mr.Harris. Actually bold is the wrong word. Bojohn harris-1/14/1998
1574 Fonix / Siemens Parx Sarcasm: <<Siemens and fonix have clearly conspireRandall E Westberg-1/14/1998
1573 John, no I don't know how far back the Siemens relationship goes but it seeMark Cox-1/14/1998
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):