SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech
Berkshire Hathaway Class B
An SI Board Since May 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
1652 93 0 BRK.B
Emcee:  Patricia W. Harris Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
1602I'm a bit BRK fan. When deciding investments for my son, was tempted to put hoyasaxa-7/15/2005
1601For anyone interested I just noticed that Boulder Total Return Fund (BTF) has a Moominoid-7/10/2005
1600$200 is probably a decent price for GOOG. I have a very small short position. MaMoominoid-7/2/2005
1599I've still got some google since the IPO and am hoping the price stablizes sGreen Receipt-7/2/2005
1598And Google B shares :)Moominoid-7/2/2005
1597lol i knew that... i was just seeing who would bite. but still u gotta admire tGreen Receipt-7/2/2005
1596the "R" in David R. Stockwell stands for moron,bucko-7/2/2005
1595The B shares are always very close to 1/30 of the price of the A. They are not pMoominoid-7/2/2005
1594Buffett is always investing in derivatives, commodities, currencies. There is a Moominoid-7/2/2005
1593I think if u have a choice ur better off having the A shares. The b shares wereGreen Receipt-7/1/2005
1592saw an obnoxious article that said Buffet was investing in derivatives (weather,Green Receipt-7/1/2005
1591Sigh... All one has to do is click on a simple Yahoo! link and yet, you still cDave-6/30/2005
1590Sigh...OK,--for pedantic insulter Dave, to be exact--March '99. The whole fMichael Cash-6/30/2005
1589Sigh...there really isn't any excuse for ignorance these days given the pletDave-6/29/2005
1588Pardon me--6 years ago!!!! Even worse!!! I suppose timing is everything after alMichael Cash-6/29/2005
1587Michael, RE: "[T]hat's what they said 5 years ago--at 2587--" BDave-6/29/2005
1586Perhaps people are wondering if more issues will come to light at General Re etcMoominoid-6/29/2005
1585"Wait ten years...." that's what they said 5 years ago--at 2587--Michael Cash-6/29/2005
1584Who cares. The shares are worth more then they are trading for. Buy more, close hoyasaxa-6/28/2005
1583Who cares. The shares are worth more then they are trading for. Buy more, close hoyasaxa-6/28/2005
1582I had shares when it IPO'd Made a nice profit after a few months and got ouGreen Receipt-6/28/2005
1581At least it's not falling :) According to this it is bargain: creativeacadMoominoid-6/27/2005
1580Dead money? How much longer, if ever, will it take for this thing to move? Is Michael Cash-6/27/2005
1579BRK was not traded on a public board on 1/1/85 (New year's day) but it tradeThe Duke of URL©-5/7/2005
1578Could someone with access to historical data post the price of BRK "A"Dale Baker-5/7/2005
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News