SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy
American Eco (ECGOF, ECX on Toronto exchange)
An SI Board Since April 1997
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
2841 13 0 ECX
Emcee:  david james Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
1616 Back on January 22nd--"DBCO Synopsis" <<Purchase Price SpeculaDuncan-2/7/1998
1615 "30 million cash (mentioned in article) + $2/share x 31.5 shares = 93 milldavid james-2/7/1998
1614 Here's one possibility: 30 million cash (mentioned in article) + $2/sharHarry_Behemoth-2/7/1998
1613 Sparky, I'm a bit confused by your comment that Zacks has increased its david james-2/7/1998
1612 From the Yahoo board: Subj: ECGOF offers $93M for DBCO By: cansteel Peter Haynes-2/7/1998
1611 <<I don't know how McGinnis, or any officer can make any clear definiMark Dorros-2/7/1998
1610 Mark: I went back and read many of the notes going back to late fall. I know whSparky Beardslee-2/7/1998
1609 I stand corrected Mr. Norris, you are correct. You have to admit though, that Michael Anthony-2/6/1998
1608 Sparky, no disrespect intended. Sorry if I gave off that impression, but I musMichael Anthony-2/6/1998
1607 <i>There is no conference call. Never had one yet. Confirmed by IR. Now tRaymond James Norris-2/6/1998
1606 Sparky, You're wrong on all accounts. McGinnis has stated on several occGemini-2/6/1998
1605 My oppologies for those last remarks. >YoSparky Beardslee-2/6/1998
1604 And David, the growth expected this quarter over last year's 4th quarter isMark Dorros-2/6/1998
1603 Michael: Presumptuous is the best word to describe the notes going back severaSparky Beardslee-2/6/1998
1602 The growth expected this quarter, over last years 4th quarter is even greater tdavid james-2/6/1998
1601 >>it appears we have all become a bit presumptuous with the $1.20 for yeaMichael Anthony-2/6/1998
1600 There is no conference call. Never had one yet. Confirmed by IR. Now they maMichael Anthony-2/6/1998
1599 Mark: it appears we have all become a bit presumptuous with the $1.20 for yearSparky Beardslee-2/6/1998
1598 Pete, don't know the date for the conf. call. I'm sure it will be annoMARK BARGER-2/6/1998
1597 "The upcoming conference call will be enlightening as Mike addresses the DPeter H. Mack-2/6/1998
1596 Kind of anticlimactic today wasn't it. No news, no stock movement, no nothMARK BARGER-2/6/1998
1595 This may be one of the many reasons that no one wants to pay too much for DBCO.david james-2/6/1998
1594 I have the same exact thing on my report from my brokerage house. I called, buAnthony W-2/5/1998
1593 An "A" for effort today. SparkySparky Beardslee-2/5/1998
1592 Thanks for the reply. I called Jack White and they admitted to making a mistakejoe doe-2/5/1998
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):