SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
SCO Group (SCOX)
An SI Board Since January 2000
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
239 8 0 SCOX
Emcee:  Glenn Petersen Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
164Hello wizzkid, I'll again reiterate the base fact: the cases are still movScott C. Lemon-3/6/2007
163Hello Scott Leomon. You continue attacking me for being religious while offerinwizzkid-3/6/2007
162Hello wizzkid, First off, I forgot to acknowledge you and thank you for joiningScott C. Lemon-3/6/2007
161You are correct, the fat lady is not singing yet. I don't recall bringing upwizzkid-3/5/2007
160Hello ralph_arrow, > What you didn't mention is that IBM has numerous &Scott C. Lemon-3/5/2007
159Hello wizzkid, I'm amused by your post. Great emotional ranting, however lScott C. Lemon-3/5/2007
158Scott: >> In only takes *one* claim to "win." << What yoralph_arrow-3/3/2007
157Scott Lemon, you are talking total nonsense. You are implying IBM is employing dwizzkid-3/3/2007
156Let's see if I get this. Despite public claims to the contrary, SCO has failKashish King-1/19/2007
155SCOX suffers another setback in its case against IBM: <b>New Blow To SCO&Glenn Petersen-1/19/2007
154>>>Well ... here goes the next volley .........."IBM directed'tonysee200x-1/19/2007
153>>> settlement offers *only* come when the case nears trial. <<&ltonysee200x-12/12/2006
152Hello tonysee200x, From what I have been told by various lawyers - both involveScott C. Lemon-12/9/2006
151disclaimer -- I have no legal background. I have never really followed any legaltonysee200x-12/6/2006
150Hello tonysee200x, > Scott – What are you basing this belief on? From a widScott C. Lemon-12/6/2006
149>>>> whether SCO can last long enough financially to go to court ...tonysee200x-12/4/2006
148Hello tonysee200x, I'm watching the stock now down at $1.22/share ... and aScott C. Lemon-12/2/2006
147Scott – did you give up yet? Or are you still averaging down? In July you saidtonysee200x-12/1/2006
146SCO Losing Case Over Linux Code Thursday November 30, 8:46 pm ET By Paul Foy, APScott C. Lemon-11/30/2006
145The lights just grew dimmer for SCOX: <b>SCO Gets TKO'ed</b> DGlenn Petersen-11/30/2006
144Hello Glenn, Well ... here goes the next volley ... and it's got more interScott C. Lemon-7/22/2006
143Scott, I simply have not had the time to run the numbers. Yes, SCOX is still alGlenn Petersen-7/8/2006
142Glenn, Still no answer on the question ... but they are still alive. And rightScott C. Lemon-4/10/2006
141<i>How much of a settlement would it take to make SCOX double in price?<Glenn Petersen-12/1/2005
140Hello all, I started a conversation on the Novell thread about this subject, anScott C. Lemon-7/1/2005
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):