SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Biotech / Medical
XOMA. Bull or Bear?
An SI Board Since July 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
17367 72 0 XOMA
Emcee:  Olu Emuleomo Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
16517Bob, as long at it is bio-equivalent ANYONE or ANYPLACE in the USA can make it aBluegreen-12/7/2003
16516I doubt xoma can sell any of their xoma made raptiva. Its not bio-equivilent. AsRobert K.-12/7/2003
16515We had nearly 3000 patients in the psoriasis trials. Most will probably continuLarryS-12/7/2003
16514Well said Blue. I dont disagree with anything you said. I also dont disagree witRobert K.-12/6/2003
16513I see a completely different picture. I see where already almost 3,000 (THREE TBluegreen-12/6/2003
16512Blue>there is/was a poster on sepr board that had access to weekly script couRobert K.-12/6/2003
16511Thats actually not such a bad idea for cacaito. He is smart enough to pick a gooRobert K.-12/6/2003
16510Cacaito I think the idea is to try to find uses for Neuprex ergo the study in peBluegreen-12/4/2003
16509Bob, who keeps track of Raptiva scripts? Is it one company or many? Does a regBluegreen-12/4/2003
16508Not Farmer but the other analyst sure missed BIG TIME on his guess about AmeviveLarryS-12/4/2003
16507Are they alive! do they keep Weiss et al, in bpi infusion ! No wonder, they resCacaito-12/3/2003
16506Whilst Cacaito panders to his own investments, I would like to point out that I Robert K.-12/3/2003
16505Come on Cacaito, you can do better than that.LOL Cheers!Bluegreen-12/3/2003
16504Wrong in 2004, and Wrong in his comparison of Raptiva vs Amevive. Raptiva IS aCacaito-12/3/2003
16503Bluegreen> I am personally projecting profitability in 2006 or thereabouts. PRobert K.-12/3/2003
16502Bob, who is George Farmer and why does he predict Xoma will be PROFITABLE by theBluegreen-12/2/2003
16501Good to hear from you again Ed. Good luck with your investments. Cheers!Bluegreen-12/2/2003
16500Bluegreen, Please forgive. Now that I've heard your explanation I understanEdscharp-12/2/2003
16499Ed, when you bring MIRACLE biologics to market like Raptiva, explain how this coBluegreen-12/2/2003
16498Bluegreen, Having cash is an excellent reason for Management to continue operatEdscharp-12/2/2003
16497XOMA IS FLUSH WITH CASH!!!!! Get used to it Ed. XOMA IS FLUSH WITH CASH!!!!! Bluegreen-12/2/2003
16496Blue, <I>"Don't forget also that Xoma is now flush with cash!!!!Edscharp-12/2/2003
16495Don't forget also that Xoma is now flush with cash!!!!!!!Bluegreen-12/1/2003
16494Maybe, Pdli will buy xoma !!! They have rights to Raptiva, and to many other DnaCacaito-12/1/2003
16493IT JUST KEEPS GETTING BETTER AND BETTER!!!!!!!!!!!! EVERY OTHER WEEK DOSING POSBluegreen-11/30/2003
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News