SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Biotech / Medical
VISX
An SI Board Since May 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
1754 27 0 VISX
Emcee:  Daryl Gresham Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
1654 Good luck P! There is no welcoming committee. There is plenty of fear. GoodMGV-2/23/2000
1653 Just took a long position! I doubt there is a welcoming committee for VISX todaPatherzen-2/23/2000
1652 This language from the Goldman Sachs note fairly parallels my view: <i>&MGV-2/23/2000
1651 This is definitely a scorched earth tactic. VISX knew it would absorb a big huMGV-2/23/2000
1650 closed visx, added to ditc. good luck to all longs. hope everyone does well.zx-2/23/2000
1649 Sam: Most telling remark by Logan on conference call this AM: <i>"Charlie Smith-2/23/2000
1648 I took my 4th tranche of VISX this morning and took initial positions in LCAV, Sam Citron-2/23/2000
1647 Michael, Did your doc say why he would jump to a competitive system? Was it onSam Citron-2/23/2000
1646 <<Would you mind sharing what he said? Let's not add innuendo to the Michael Young-2/23/2000
1645 <i>My doc only had bad things to say about VISX.</i> Would you minSam Citron-2/23/2000
1644 Ouch. $2.00 -> $0.80 (eom)LiPolymer-2/23/2000
1643 Early 2000 EPS range from First Call today: Goldman Sachs: $.80-.90 PaineWebbemts362-2/23/2000
1642 I think this was more of a hedge then desperation. If the ITC and Patent officeyosid-2/23/2000
1641 VISX- Here is the lastet tick on the chart as of Tue close.. crashpages.com$Mogul-2/23/2000
1640 <i>I'm definitely disappointed, and view this more as a deperation HerbVic-2/22/2000
1639 A rough look at how revenues and earnings can drop in 2000 from 1999: AssumingJim Mac-2/22/2000
1638 <<If volume increases by only 33%, >> I'm not sure that is goiMichael Young-2/22/2000
1637 The calculations were relative not absolute, if that is clear to you. Whether MGV-2/22/2000
1636 Fair enough - We disagree on revised estimates. Thats what makes a market. MGV-2/22/2000
1635 <I> forecast for procedure volume in 2000 was about 1.5 Million. </I&gmts362-2/22/2000
1634 Bottomline: 1 year from today, VISX is up at least 50% from today's close. MGV-2/22/2000
1633 They sell the equipment but about 2/3 of revenue is from licenses, fees, etc.Robert G. Harrell-2/22/2000
1632 The forecast for procedure volume in 2000 was about 1.5 Million. VISX is estimMGV-2/22/2000
1631 It also derives revenue from laser sales (~$55 mil in '00 including internamts362-2/22/2000
1630 Charlie: I have a question: Is license fee the only income visx has. How muCJ Mark-2/22/2000
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News