SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech
Tulipomania Blowoff Contest: Why and When will it end?
An SI Board Since December 1998
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
3543 66 0 YHOO
Emcee:  Sir Auric Goldfinger Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
1668 Auric, watching your continued riling of YHOO bulls with great glee - keep up tpater tenebrarum-7/14/1999
1667 Well Scarecrow, if yoru charts go back that far, look at the <b>morning&lSir Auric Goldfinger-7/14/1999
1666 Let's see, Auric. Since last month, after CMGI's earnings, you said, Scarecrow-7/14/1999
1665 cOUSIN SHORTY replies: NO REPsrielsentations as to COOREctness,s EH? WEll I CADon Pueblo-7/13/1999
1664 It should now be obvious that the internet stocks can progressively pull-back aHIA-7/13/1999
1663 Auric, Good article on Asensio in the July issue of Worth Online. worth.com EL KABONG!!!-7/12/1999
1662 You're right on the money, what a fun group to yank the chain of. Thanks.Sir Auric Goldfinger-7/12/1999
1661 Auric, it was fun to see you rile the eternal bulls on the YHOO thread...nothinpater tenebrarum-7/12/1999
1660 #reply-10468289 Sir Auric Goldfinger-7/12/1999
1659 i am long and short same number, but looking to change the ratio to 3 long to 5ynot-7/11/1999
1658 It's kinda scary that a top official would say something like that. Of couwanmore-7/11/1999
1657 Leeza, Thanks for the kind words. Last week's data now posted - a remarkablHoatzin-7/11/1999
1656 thanks, intersting read eom ynot ;)ynot-7/11/1999
1655 Thought you all would like to see what Japan top finance officals think of our wanmore-7/11/1999
1654 Mad2, here is my idea WHY and WHEN...too tired to confirm the rules... This poynot-7/11/1999
1653 Well, I hope your proven incorrect in refering to the <i>past</i> MMad2-7/10/1999
1652 Mad2, Just couldn't resist. I found the reference to this thread on the nokili-7/10/1999
1651 Kevin, Nice site--thanks for providing and upkeeping the data on the price flucLeeza Rodriguez-7/9/1999
1650 Kim, I thought the most common date interpreted was July 4, 1999, although I unMad2-7/9/1999
1649 They will fall on September 6 1999. Why: Obvious, isn't it? Nostradamus'kili-7/9/1999
1648 Just have to say NOT ANYTIME SOON!!!!!!!!!!!!!! $Mogul-7/7/1999
1647 Don't blame Mr. G if Bubba's breathing down his neck...clearly this is charger-7/7/1999
1646 Thanks for the info. I devoured all 3 articles... I hope I'm on the rightcharger-7/7/1999
1645 rode the wave again today and sold just before the close......except for one sowanmore-7/6/1999
1644 Bobby, put/call ratios today: CBOE total: 0,42 - record low again! individual epater tenebrarum-7/6/1999
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):