SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends
Terms of Use: Are They Still Enforced?
An SI Board Since April 2002
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
92 6 0
Emcee:  Poet Type:  Moderated
 Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
17<I>The point was that the bar of who can post to whom should not be set byPoet-5/1/2002
16Hi Jane, I wasn't aware of that situation. Have you made formal TOU complaPoet-5/1/2002
15<i>i>f I were them, I would have a long time ago: a very necessary CYA,Lazarus_Long-5/1/2002
14<i>You can do what you like and post to whom you like</i> That'Lazarus_Long-5/1/2002
13<i>...under discussion in BB for a few days now, should SI intervene? <one_less-5/1/2002
12Oh please I don't want to be bound by anyone I should think that would be clepicure-5/1/2002
11In a previous incarnation of the rules of that thread, which I understood to stiLazarus_Long-5/1/2002
10NO! Look at how many posts Softechie posts on Zeev's Turnip thread. At oneJane4IceCream-5/1/2002
9How on earth was I "on his case"? Except to challenge his very stupidepicure-4/30/2002
8In the situation which has been under discussion in BB for a few days now, shoulLazarus_Long-4/30/2002
7<i>"But let's bring it down to a more personal level: When X was one_less-4/30/2002
6" Use Silicon Investor for illegal purposes or for the transmission of mateLazarus_Long-4/30/2002
5It appears the ideal situation is to be an attorney in the state of WA (InfospacLazarus_Long-4/30/2002
4I am not a lawyer but it is my opinion that once an organization declares a polione_less-4/30/2002
3Of course. They should enforce them or re-write them. Their new motto could be &E-4/30/2002
2I agree with you. You know, as long as SI is still functioning, I think it behoPoet-4/30/2002
1<i>Are the TOU still being enforced?</i> This is not enforced: a) E-4/30/2002
 Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):