SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Biotech / Medical
Apricus Biosciences
An SI Board Since September 2014
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
2026 18 0 APRI
Emcee:  mokelumne river Type:  Moderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
1701Good posts here lately...as always. Good to see that IR gave some good (non presStrong Long-2/17/2016
1700Waiting for the last Institutions to update their holdings in Apricus for the quMirror Image-2/17/2016
1699The original agreement with Sarissa 'may' have been reason for ending upphoenix_rising-2/16/2016
1698I certainly agree with you about the jokers on the other board. They often makeoldcoach19-2/16/2016
1697No Offense meant to you, Old Coach. It was intended for other individuals on thMirror Image-2/16/2016
1696Well MI, I was one of the rocket scientists that voted no. I was so upset by theoldcoach19-2/16/2016
1695I am back to staying logged in on my home and work PCs, so can't see his nonphoenix_rising-2/16/2016
1694Nice Phoenix. Forgot what your ID was on that board. Interesting how that one Mirror Image-2/15/2016
1693I called him on his lies regarding institutions leaving and provided links as evphoenix_rising-2/15/2016
1692I don't like being called a "fool", why don't you take your bapriluv-2/15/2016
1691Jeez, What a joke IHUB has become! I hardly ever take a look at that board anymMirror Image-2/15/2016
1690But he still needs the retail investor to be a believer (aka a fool) to make himhentied-2/15/2016
1689MI, Thanks for your insight. I agree, we ALL should vote. The only solice I haveOldBoar-2/13/2016
1688i voted yes .... Denner plus good Fis results and we might have a real company fapriluv-2/12/2016
1687Regarding Quorum 17,645,000+ Shares must be Voted to make the vote results VALMirror Image-2/12/2016
1686In my opinion, it's a lose / lose less situation. I would have preferred thaMirror Image-2/12/2016
1685Does it really matter what we think?oldcoach19-2/12/2016
1684Gang, Insight/opinions on upcoming meeting and vote? Old BoarOldBoar-2/12/2016
1683yes, i agree, but a better cold temp device in 2016 would be a good thing, and ieico20-2/9/2016
1682They are just trying to put a positive spin on RTD not working out I think.phoenix_rising-2/9/2016
1681what's most interesting is they are going for changes on both cold and room eico20-2/9/2016
1680Thanks Eico. I did a quick search and found nothing ( so far ) on print regardiMirror Image-2/9/2016
1679Matt clearly said it applies to the RTD, it makes sense if the RTD is delayed, aeico20-2/9/2016
1678for the RTD confirmed by Matt: Transition to dispenser with a new material of coMirror Image-2/9/2016
1677good point MI, if cold temp is approved it only takes an additional 6 months to eico20-2/9/2016
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News