SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Biotech / Medical
VISX
An SI Board Since May 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
1754 27 0 VISX
Emcee:  Daryl Gresham Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
1704 Here is the news for VISX shareholders seeking revenge! biz.yahoo.comRam Seetharaman-3/1/2000
1703 They are nearly always ways of transferring money from the company to the plainnihil-3/1/2000
1702 An implicitly cooperating duopoly may be profitable to both companies but both nihil-3/1/2000
1701 I'd say that the BOL advantage is one of intrenched sales force infrastructHerbVic-3/1/2000
1700 Simply saying they have the size to finance sizable losses in LVC (and make thiCharlie Smith-3/1/2000
1699 What does 1.8 billion in sales have to do with anything? Just because you haveJeff Lins-3/1/2000
1698 nihil: <i>It is dangerous for the entering firm (BOL) to initiate a pricCharlie Smith-3/1/2000
1697 Its just an exercise by corrupt lawyers. No one will benefit except the attornWayne-3/1/2000
1696 Several class action suits filed against VisX for buyers between 3/99 and 2/00.Mikeh-3/1/2000
1695 A deep pocket with a comparable product trying to enter monopolized market shounihil-3/1/2000
1694 Feb/00 short interest for Visx, 5,423,724M shares. Jan was 3.17M shares.Jan Crawley-2/28/2000
1693 VANCOUVER, British Columbia--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Feb. 25, 2000-- Lasik VisioWoz-2/25/2000
1692 Mark: <i>Price is the key for the moment. Without a decided technology aCharlie Smith-2/24/2000
1691 Charlie, We can talk more later but 1st impressions are that your numbers can&MGV-2/24/2000
1690 Assuming earnings this year of $.90 and $1.15 next, about $27.Charlie Smith-2/24/2000
1689 What is VISX worth today anyone have a clue?GS_Wall Street-2/24/2000
1688 Charlie, $100 is obviously the new price point and I think it will last. DiscoSam Citron-2/24/2000
1687 Mark: <i>``As the playing field is leveled by the reduction in per-proceCharlie Smith-2/24/2000
1686 Just saw Logan on CNBC. Not very impressive. The rationale for price cutting sojelrod3-2/24/2000
1685 Sam: Seems as if it does. $100 is now the number and deep pockets wins. How loCharlie Smith-2/24/2000
1684 No, my take from the sentence below is that B&L has chosen for the moment tMGV-2/24/2000
1683 <i>I'd expect B&L to wait for the PTO decision expected in March Sam Citron-2/24/2000
1682 <i>What happens if they win in court? Do royalty rates go back up?</i&bluejeans-2/24/2000
1681 <i>Maybe VISX should have put the money into brand recognition (advertisiCharlie Smith-2/24/2000
1680 Thanks, Ron. Is VISX within your scope of expertise? If so, would love to hear Sam Citron-2/24/2000
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News