SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Progress Software
An SI Board Since June 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
296 13 0 PRGS
Emcee:  felix Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
171 No. I don't follow this issue closely.Umnik-6/17/1997
170 If anyone cares... biz.yahoo.com Do you know what time earnings come out FridaS. maltophilia-6/16/1997
169 This is an attempt to revive this dormant thread. Is anyone out there? Any opUmnik-6/11/1997
168 PHIL Unlikely to be a new issue in the near future. Hard to say why it moved,S. maltophilia-4/9/1997
167 Khalil, Thx for your input. It seems that you don't see this new issue affePHIL K.-4/9/1997
166 Most companies increase the number of authorized shares prior to a split--whichS. maltophilia-4/9/1997
165 David, I meant the common stock issue of increasing the common stock from 20 m PHIL K.-4/8/1997
164 David, I was talking about the recent proxy sent to me on PRGS offering 200,000PHIL K.-4/7/1997
163 Phil, I thought your question was in reference to the Gupta litigation that soDavid Kawaguchi-4/7/1997
162 Thanks for the info.Umnik-4/7/1997
161 David, In reference to the issuing of more shares being proxied. What is your oPHIL K.-4/7/1997
160 Leo, I think about 3.5 to 4 years ago Gupta attempted to increase their marketDavid Kawaguchi-4/5/1997
159 David Kawaguchi: I am not sure I understand your reference to the lesson learnMENSO-4/4/1997
158 Not a problem. I can not comment on question one as it entails discussing confDavid Kawaguchi-4/4/1997
157 David, thanks for the info. By no means I was tryng to be negative about PRGS.Umnik-4/4/1997
156 I understand your frustrations. I believe that Progress is best served by itDavid Kawaguchi-4/3/1997
155 David, so where are the real news? All one has to look at is their annual reporUmnik-4/3/1997
154 I thought I would drop this information into this thread. Progress Software reDavid Kawaguchi-4/1/1997
153 Hi Vicki! My apologies to all those who read this thread since this message haJeffrey L. Henken-3/26/1997
152 Vicki, you and your bozo friends (Phil & Jim) should take your collective bGreg-3/17/1997
151 Phil, Nice action today on PRGS. He who laughs last........... (HA HA HA HA HAV.-3/11/1997
150 Vicki, Nobody Does????????????? Later Phil K. "I don't get mad, I getPHIL K.-3/6/1997
149 Off Topic: Apologies to the thread. Ouch, he humbly trudges off to the swirlinJim Fisher-3/6/1997
148 Ya, Phil, it's coming...and when it does, you will surely know. ;] We'V.-3/6/1997
147 YOU'D BETTER WATCH YOURSELF JAMES D. FISHER, BECAUSE YOU MAY BE NEXT. Oh, yV.-3/6/1997
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News