SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Rockwell-Spins off Conexant (CNXT)
An SI Board Since January 1999
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
2013 83 0 CNXT
Emcee:  jas244 Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
1713I sure hope this earlier post I made is wrong. Message 14516413 good luck hankgreggcap-10/18/2000
1712If there is a bad earnings report, I'd be surprised. They would've knowMeDroogies-10/18/2000
1711Sure looks like it, and I wish I could congratulate David, but since he is not sMcNabb Brothers-10/18/2000
1710Hate to say this but I think my crystal ball might be defective. It seems like Anthony-10/18/2000
1709correction, this should have been the second post: Message 14606064 HankMcNabb Brothers-10/18/2000
1708As always, Hank. Both of your links are to the same message. You may think thatDavid W. Taylor-10/18/2000
1707David, For your information this is hot off Hank McNabb's desk! First postMcNabb Brothers-10/18/2000
1706Hot off the press from the desk of Rick Ackerman, author of "Black Box ForeDavid W. Taylor-10/18/2000
1705gpowell, You are correct that the barriers to entry are high but isn't thatDavid W. Taylor-10/17/2000
1704You shouln't lump all semis into the same boat. There is quite a bit of diffgpowell-10/17/2000
1703You will need more than a crystal ball. Why would business for Conexant be bettDavid W. Taylor-10/17/2000
1702MeDroogies, You are in VERY heavy denial. The markets are in worse shape than David W. Taylor-10/17/2000
1701Why would you even bait this guy? Despite 2 major technical reversals this yeaMeDroogies-10/17/2000
1700David, my crystal ball tell me this stock is moving to the 50+ range after earniAnthony-10/17/2000
1699"Comments?" Yea, my comment is GET A LIFE! If you spent as much timeLou D-10/16/2000
1698Conexant 46.83% Under Valued ?? Possibly. There was an interesting article in David W. Taylor-10/16/2000
1697Tomorrow should be positive in the AM. AMCC beat estimates, provided positive gTechplayer-10/12/2000
1696"Again I have decided to try and resist the temptation to tickle the fish iLou D-10/11/2000
1695When are earnings suppose to be announced? HankMcNabb Brothers-10/11/2000
1694MeDroogies!!! Roll on my target price. We have far further to fall here. AgaiDavid W. Taylor-10/11/2000
1693When are you guys going to forget about him? He hasn't been correct since MeDroogies-10/11/2000
1692I respect your right to say what ever you want but I don't respect your opinThe Ox-10/11/2000
1691There was a time when the management of a company would make moves that would beDavid W. Taylor-10/11/2000
1690LOL, TP! Face it. There's nobody more full of himself on this board then The Ox-10/11/2000
1689David David David, >Hank, now curiously silent, has probably had a margin caMcNabb Brothers-10/11/2000
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News