SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Symantec (SYMC) - What does it look like?
An SI Board Since May 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
2069 61 0 SYMC
Emcee:  Ilya A. Vasserman Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
1744 New virus on the street. It comes in the form of a resume so beware. SYMC mayGeoff Altman-5/30/2000
1743 BUY SYMANTEC ! LOOK AT THIS. $100 SOON. IT'S UNDERVALUED COMPARED TO CHECKPGregg-5/25/2000
1742 Symantec to Discuss Computer Security Issues At the Internet Service Provider CGeoff Altman-5/24/2000
1741 CUPERTINO, Calif.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--May 24, 2000--Symantec Corp. (Nasdaq:SYMC -Geoff Altman-5/24/2000
1740 A couple of nice articles from Bloomberg yesterday...... quote.bloomberg.com Geoff Altman-5/23/2000
1739 Re: Morningstar. Hey jbe, sorry dude, for the belated response. I'm on a hoastyanax-5/21/2000
1738 Caught a virus? Invest in the cure moneycentral.msn.com As high-profile attaElmer Flugum-5/8/2000
1737 CNBC reporting that SYMC is zeroing in on the "love bug" virus in AsiWallace Rivers-5/5/2000
1736 Thanks for dropping by, Netconductor, and sorry to hear you are dropping out (ojbe-4/28/2000
1735 Re: Morningstar.com drops coverage of Symantec SYMC. Hi guys, thanks for askingastyanax-4/27/2000
1734 Herd mentality. Fundamentally, SYMC looks much better than ever before. I wisSonny Bui-4/24/2000
1733 Other than tech downdraft, any reason for today's fall? vampire-4/24/2000
1732 It's interesting to note that when SYMC was around 81 a few weeks ago, the Sonny Bui-4/24/2000
1731 On second look, you are right,M6: the Morningstar data are misleading, becausejbe-4/24/2000
1730 I too am talking about the future, as extrapolated from the present. Look at tjbe-4/23/2000
1729 Accelerated in the past - I'm talking about the future (which counts). EPSvampire-4/23/2000
1728 Actually, it looks as if the growth rate (of revenue as well as of EPS and cashjbe-4/23/2000
1727 Growth i slowing from previous years - hence the lower multiple - am i incorrecvampire-4/23/2000
1726 "all the analysts see growth slowing"? I think not - some have <iWallace Rivers-4/22/2000
1725 The slower growth going forward is certainly the reason for the "reasonablvampire-4/22/2000
1724 <I><<<2001 ends March 31, 2001 - right?>>> </I> RSonny Bui-4/21/2000
1723 Correct me if I'm wrong, but 2001 ends March 31, 2001 - right? wrong? this vampire-4/21/2000
1722 Prudential Securities maintains strong buy rating and boosts 2001 earnings estiSonny Bui-4/20/2000
1721 OK, perhaps I'm exaggerating - but I will say that companies that even sligvampire-4/20/2000
1720 Estimates are not always on the low side, M6, or else companies would not fail jbe-4/20/2000
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):