SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Oracle Corporation (ORCL)
An SI Board Since May 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
19079 388 0 ORCL
Emcee:  SI (no user) Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
17529Hi Lizzie, My take on it, is that companies MUST upgrade their systems over a peehasfjord-9/17/2002
17528Iraq's decision probably sending Nasdaq and S & P futures up sharply >Qualified Opinion-9/16/2002
17527Oracle Shareholder Suit Over Executive Stock Sales Dismissed By Karen Gullo SanQualified Opinion-9/13/2002
17526Banc of America Securities says Oracle is gaining steam in report 9/12/02 AnalyJakeStraw-9/13/2002
17525<i>Anyway, just think it's flaky that these analysts are still throwinLizzie Tudor-9/13/2002
17524<<Using the consensus FTM EPS, one arrives at a P/E of 22.9x.>> Agralburk-9/13/2002
17523<i>Price target seems very optimistic given comments "on track for .0JSwanson-9/12/2002
17522Price target seems very optimistic given comments "on track for .07 and modalburk-9/12/2002
17521anybody think any different than this... (sounds right to me)- <i>Oracle (Lizzie Tudor-9/12/2002
17520I say LE has a trick up his sleeve and beats consensus by .01 or .02.MeDroogies-9/11/2002
17519thanks for the brief bio, Michael. So, anyone care to guess the license line inTurs-9/11/2002
17518HI medroogies, Excellent read. The credit analyst is as good as it gets. My Drobert b furman-9/4/2002
17517General public expects DOW below 5000; NASDAQ at 1000. Everyone is expecting thDavid S.-9/4/2002
17516MeDroogies, I've been looking for my bell bottoms. <G> I don't expNight Writer-9/4/2002
17515well, it's all perspective. It's been some time since I thought the recMeDroogies-9/3/2002
17514re: <i>But pretty much in line with what SHOULD have been expected....LOL.Lizzie Tudor-9/3/2002
17513That'll be fifty cents, please. Nothing is free in this market. I'mMeDroogies-9/3/2002
17512Good Advice. Thanks Bobrobert b furman-9/3/2002
17511Turs, Sorry no response for a while, I've been away. My experience is mostBelowTheCrowd-9/3/2002
17510not today....I'm gonna wait to see tomorrow. Manufacturing #'s were goodMeDroogies-9/3/2002
17509chug chug chug - coming off the bottom. Bobrobert b furman-9/3/2002
17508VERY oversold....http://stockcharts.com/def/servlet/SC.web?c=orcl,uu[h,a]daclyiaMeDroogies-9/3/2002
17507Looking like a good entry point here - oversold and BOP is staying positive. Dorobert b furman-9/3/2002
17506Hi ehasfjord, Just as "higher ed" is fragmented into many similar neerobert b furman-9/1/2002
17505I agree with the basic premise. Higher Ed. has been doing this type of thing foehasfjord-9/1/2002
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News