SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics
Electoral College 2000 - Ahead of the Curve
An SI Board Since October 2000
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
6710 8 0
Emcee:  Cisco Type:  Moderated
Introduction Compact
Previous 40 | Next 40 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
1761Sir, Article II Section I Clause of the Constitution suggests to me that the ElLazarus_Long-11/11/2000
1760I agree. Im always amused at what comes out of some of these liberal sludge pumpVendit™-11/11/2000
1759"The law that you are citing applies to paper ballots qua paper ballots&quoWindsock-11/11/2000
1758Of course the Republicans are fighting the manual recount because they are afraiIlaine-11/11/2000
1757I've always voted using voting machines. I was doing some research on the nIlaine-11/11/2000
1756Cross-burning has mostly gone out of style, too. Today's cross-burners are Ilaine-11/11/2000
1755freerepublic.com <b>"Disclaimer</b>: Opinions posted on Free RWindsock-11/11/2000
1754Actually in my opinion, it's the other way around <g> Why are the repSusan G-11/11/2000
1753In today's Washington Post(ComPost as the Republicans call the paper), Page TraderGreg-11/11/2000
1752You're right, it makes no clear distinction...I don't understand why thaTraderGreg-11/11/2000
1751Blue--You are correct...to an extent. The Civil Rights Act was pushed through aTraderGreg-11/11/2000
1750<i>I understand Gore's frustration. He probably should have won the elTriffin-11/11/2000
1749OK, I've cut and pasted the statute to the thread at least twice, and I knowIlaine-11/11/2000
1748I live in the South, too, and the type of people that burn crosses are not liberIlaine-11/11/2000
1747I don't challenge your reference to the FL law about ballot design, but you TraderGreg-11/11/2000
1746I am not losing my credibility...Trent Lott himself made that "lightning stTraderGreg-11/11/2000
1745I agree with you and I believe that the Congress should not invalidate FL from tTraderGreg-11/11/2000
1744Sounds like it's a case of what goes around comes around. The only way to gIlaine-11/11/2000
1743Let's make this whole thing a bit more complicated: From the 12th AmendmentTraderGreg-11/11/2000
1742If you can prove I've made an error, do so. You're relying on what the Ilaine-11/11/2000
1741LOL Case closed! :8-)Vendit™-11/11/2000
1740Greg <b>And the right asks for lightning to strike or burns crosses on laVendit™-11/11/2000
1739The law that you are citing applies to paper ballots qua paper ballots. It doesIlaine-11/11/2000
1738President Bush is picking his cabinet. <b>Bush Cabinet selections telegraVendit™-11/11/2000
1737>>If it can be left or right, can it be left for one set of candidates forIlaine-11/11/2000
1736Florida DID elect members of the Electoral College on National Election Day, it Ilaine-11/11/2000
1735Triffin Your question would be better answered by Cisco or TraderGreg.Vendit™-11/11/2000
1734freerepublic.comCarolyn-11/11/2000
1733Carolyn--The manual recount is done by three people per ballot who manually scanTraderGreg-11/11/2000
1732Sandy--The manual re-count option is within EXISTING FL law. Republicans filingTraderGreg-11/11/2000
1731I think they do not trust the propensity of the Democrats to "find" neCarolyn-11/11/2000
1730The Democrats are dragging this thing out, and not giving a darn about their cousandintoes-11/11/2000
1729It seems that now all of a sudden the Repubs believe that FL law re: manual recoTraderGreg-11/11/2000
1728Re: "Just heard the Repubs have filed seeking an injunction to stop a manuaWindsock-11/11/2000
1727The FL Supervisor of Elections is stating that the manual recount is THE definitTraderGreg-11/11/2000
1726Re: "Which presidential candidate was convicted of a DUI ?" Shrub BusWindsock-11/11/2000
1725Just heard the Repubs have filed seeking an injunction to stop a manual recount TraderGreg-11/11/2000
1724Jim--The closest thing to a precedent that I have is the 1876 election where 2 sTraderGreg-11/11/2000
1723<<You have to admit that liberals get hilariously funny when they are paniTraderGreg-11/11/2000
1722Vendit--Only because you made a comment on it, am I going to say this: The proTraderGreg-11/11/2000
Previous 40 | Next 40 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News