SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Seagate Technology - Fundamentals
An SI Board Since November 1998
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
1989 20 0 STX
Emcee:  Stitch Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
1789 Thx for your comments, Mark, and Happy Easter to you and everyone else here! trStruggling Investor-4/23/2000
1788 Trish - Now I'm paranoid also. The existing BOD and management desperatelMark Madden-4/23/2000
1787 Also, Mark - why not just pass along the SNDK shares to VRTS? Why sell them andStruggling Investor-4/22/2000
1786 Mark, what bothers me is that SEG basically has "carte blanche" to doStruggling Investor-4/22/2000
1785 Trish - Thank you for putting the research together. I have not caught up to Mark Madden-4/22/2000
1784 SEG has filed 144's since 2/23 to sell 1.865M more shares of SNDK: 2/29: 50Struggling Investor-4/22/2000
1783 Gus, Ross Johnson & Henry Kravits seem like rank amateurs, n'est-ce pasStruggling Investor-4/22/2000
1782 Agree, Sarmad, that VRTS seems overvalued, particularly in light of what seems Struggling Investor-4/22/2000
1781 >> ALMOST 1 BILLION DOLLARS. Where is that money going? I'd bet on onSarmad Y. Hermiz-4/22/2000
1780 We won't know how much cash was realized from the SNDK sale until the 10-Q Struggling Investor-4/22/2000
1779 I'm confused (obviously <g>). Assuming a best case scenario (that theStruggling Investor-4/22/2000
1778 Hi, I saw the interview and I thought the Sandisk CEO said that SEG reduced thSarmad Y. Hermiz-4/22/2000
1777 It may have been 7 instead of 70 (big difference - sorry.) "Seventy" Struggling Investor-4/22/2000
1776 SEG has sold most of the Sandisk shares. This is an excerpt from a transcript oStruggling Investor-4/22/2000
1775 Larry - There was more. messages.yahoo.com I read this to say VRTS would gaiMark Madden-4/21/2000
1774 RE-Solomon Smith Barney report from the Yahoo thread (http://messages.yahoo.comLK2-4/21/2000
1773 Robert - Thanks for sharing information on the VRTS report. Here is a SolomonMark Madden-4/21/2000
1772 There isn't a word mentioned on the Seagate deal. They talk a lot about thRobert Douglas-4/20/2000
1771 Robert- Can you break out what is says, if anything, about the SEG deal? ThanksMikeM54321-4/20/2000
1770 Mark or anyone, I just received a nice 2 page report on VRTS and their earningRobert Douglas-4/20/2000
1769 thx, Mark for your comments. I'm not sure I'm cognizant enough to say &Struggling Investor-4/20/2000
1768 IMHO investors evaluate companies like VRTS much differently than they evaluateMark Madden-4/20/2000
1767 Well, VRTS didn't exactly blow away the numbers, did they? I didn't lisStruggling Investor-4/19/2000
1766 Please, Sam, don't stop on my account. <g> Your point about the IRS Gus-4/17/2000
1765 Robert, re ><i>. I am going to be buying good growth companies at reasGottfried-4/15/2000
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News