SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Cisco
An SI Board Since May 2000
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
405 19 0 CSCO
Emcee:  The Phoenix Type:  Moderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
180Cisco Watch: Listwin wanted to be the boss During a recent interview with Redherms.smartest.person-8/26/2000
179<i>I just wanted opinions, not a lecture or an attempt at conversion. I leDownSouth-8/25/2000
178Justin, This is hopefully my last comment on the subject. It was not Chamber&#ms.smartest.person-8/24/2000
177<I>If John Chambers says they are moving into the optical market, what do JRH-8/24/2000
176CSCO moving into optical components would be a grand departure from their core cDownSouth-8/23/2000
175Oh Merry, Please keep on with your ponderings. We don't have to be that stifNorm Tock-8/23/2000
174DownSouth, Thank you. I know the difference between CSCO, JDSU, their respectims.smartest.person-8/23/2000
173<i>I look to Cisco to make a big push into the optical networking area, poDownSouth-8/23/2000
172Justin, If John Chambers says they are moving into the optical market, what do ms.smartest.person-8/23/2000
171<i>I look to Cisco to make a big push into the optical networking area, poJRH-8/23/2000
170I think if you look at the main CSCO thread over the past few days, you'll sPaul Reuben-8/23/2000
169Your Welcome, Uncle Frank. You unbooked <b>THIS</b> thread? Are ms.smartest.person-8/23/2000
168Thanks for the article, Merry. I feel a little information starved since I un-bUncle Frank-8/23/2000
167Cisco Takes a Dip -------------------------------------------------------------ms.smartest.person-8/23/2000
166Justin, Thanks for replying. Obviously, all we can do is wait and see. I justms.smartest.person-8/22/2000
165Thanks for clarifying. I suggest we wait and see what happens with the auction. JRH-8/22/2000
164Justin, Thank you for responding. Sorry I was not more informative. The rumoms.smartest.person-8/21/2000
163<i>Cisco is going to bid next March on the PAX etal. frequencies</i>JRH-8/21/2000
162This is a portion of an article in the Raging Bull's Cyberstock Investor RNorm Tock-8/21/2000
161Cisco RUMOR, Opinions Welcomed... Rumor is that Cisco is going to bid next Marcms.smartest.person-8/18/2000
160Interview with Carl Russo, head of optical at CSCO. This is a *great* article Mehitabel-8/13/2000
159Hi, UF. Thanks for the great quote. I have to say that the sneering cynic seemsMehitabel-8/12/2000
158sblackm1, Sorry to hear about your cost basis, but I'll bet it looks better Ex-INTCfan-8/12/2000
157Frank Thanks for posting the comments of this man who was not only most colorfulEd Forrest-8/12/2000
156Ed, I think you might enjoy the following commentary on critics and cynics from Uncle Frank-8/12/2000
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):