NTN Communications, worth 185 million? | Stock Discussion Forums

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks
NTN Communications, worth 185 million?

An SI Board Since May 1996

Posts	SubjectMarks	Bans	Symbol
2985	9	0	NTN

Emcee: SI (no user)	Type: Unmoderated

Introduction Market Data Compact

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):

Reply	Message Preview	From	Recs	Posted
1860	Dwight, NTN closed today at 1 1/4, up 1/4 on fairly heavy volume. Based on	Boris	-	1/2/1998
1859	I am for a 1 1/4 close. This must be the January bounce everyone was talking ab	R Sandvig	-	1/2/1998
1858	Do it for the children. That is exactly the way the dope from Hope is getting	dwight vickers	-	1/2/1998
1857	Boris, Seriously. I'm positively cheery about NTN compared to our economi	dwight vickers	-	1/2/1998
1856	Dwight, Totally agree on 1 3/16 close being a good sign. Haven't traded th	Rich Genik	-	1/2/1998
1855	Dwight... a fatalist?....come on!	Boris	-	1/2/1998
1854	Rich, What is really funny is how they measure the deficit. The current (temp	dwight vickers	-	1/2/1998
1853	Dwight, The budget surplus? PAY DOWN THE DEBT! No question in my mind that tha	Rich Genik	-	1/2/1998
1852	Oh, I thought you were a fed. employee. Everyone at ATC got an extra holiday t	dwight vickers	-	1/2/1998
1851	Actually, the janitors are gone too. No pay raise. I work off of a grant from	Rich Genik	-	1/2/1998
1850	Rich, You're right about today likely being quiet for the market. Also th	dwight vickers	-	1/2/1998
1849	Notes on NTN: 1) I was out at a bar a few days ago and no one was playing the	Rich Genik	-	1/2/1998
1848	D, Because of the calander, I don't expect a January bounce to really begi	Rich Genik	-	1/2/1998
1847	Here is another SI thread that goes into REG.S stocks and other abuses. Like I	dwight vickers	-	12/31/1997
1846	Sorry. Info does not come from Mr. Sokol. Will not post. Jim	JAMES F. CLASPILL III	-	12/31/1997
1845	Just for informational purposes I saw a lot of beaten up dogs start to have the	dwight vickers	-	12/31/1997
1844	Boris, He sends private information from Sokol to all who ask. But doesn'	dwight vickers	-	12/31/1997
1843	I really have explained the difference between REG.S and D many times. They we	dwight vickers	-	12/31/1997
1842	The institutional investor would have been as guilty of trading on inside infor	dwight vickers	-	12/31/1997
1841	Jim, Info on the way to who? Balancing opinions are desirable. Important to	Boris	-	12/31/1997
1840	Daniel, Rich S. and June. Info on the way. Jim	JAMES F. CLASPILL III	-	12/30/1997
1839	June, I have not forgotten you. Okay. Jim	JAMES F. CLASPILL III	-	12/30/1997
1838	Juliand. Nice try, but you are wasteing your time here. He knows it all and yo	JAMES F. CLASPILL III	-	12/30/1997
1837	Thanks dwight. I find it hard to believe that to be true. That would be cons	JAMES F. CLASPILL III	-	12/30/1997
1836	J, So you're saying that REG.S type abuses do not exist? Or just that you	dwight vickers	-	12/30/1997

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):