SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech
USAB - USABancShares.com
An SI Board Since April 1999
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
2419 19 0 USAB
Emcee:  VeloSpeed Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
1869 Quite right. I believe that they could have avoided this whole hubub by using tMr. Tomatohead-8/18/1999
1868 This USBancorp thing reminds me of a post I made a few months ago... techstocksVeloSpeed-8/18/1999
1867 Josh, another small point. As for as company names go, it is US Bancorp vs USABdharampal luthra-8/18/1999
1866 I daytraded this stock twice for a nice quick profit going long, the MM's oHandsOn-8/18/1999
1865 USABanc was stupid to risk interfering with USABank. USABanc was stupid for wasInvestor in MI-8/18/1999
1864 Wow, I'm glad I sold this dog a few weeks ago way before this "launch&Jimbo Cobb-8/18/1999
1863 Velo & KG4, please understand I won't be raggin on USAB just because dAJ Berger-8/18/1999
1862 <i> USABanc was stupid to risk interfering with USABank. USABanc was stupBob-8/18/1999
1861 After having a blast with USAB with the last run up I was wondering if I would Probart-8/18/1999
1860 ROTFLMAO and trying to buy more at these levels !!im a survivor-8/18/1999
1859 AJ... I hope you don't have a gun collection. You are way too fast at pullVeloSpeed-8/18/1999
1858 I wonder if the United States Air Force is going to sue them because of their bKevin McKenzie-8/18/1999
1857 I think we now know why the usabanc.com launch didn't occur earlier this moVeloSpeed-8/18/1999
1856 For what it is worth, sometimes things like this can be a blessing in disguise,Probart-8/18/1999
1855 Company Changes On-Line Identification PHILADELPHIA--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Aug. 18im a survivor-8/18/1999
1854 well...you ragged on usab until you bought in, at which time you became very poim a survivor-8/18/1999
1853 For what it's Worth USABanc was stupid to risk interfering with USABank. UAJ Berger-8/18/1999
1852 U.S. Bank, based in Minneapolis, is the bank that not long ago was in trouble fBill J. Duke-8/18/1999
1851 I'm with you 100%. This will be thrown out. How can you confuse usban<b&Bob-8/18/1999
1850 Not sweating the lawsuit. But USAB share price appears to be disturbingly sensKevin McKenzie-8/18/1999
1849 Do not sweat this lawsuit. It is utterly ridiculous. The number of banks in theq-dog-8/18/1999
1848 USAB probably should have anticipated this, however, it sounds like US Banc CorKevin McKenzie-8/18/1999
1847 may be u.s. bancorp would like to purchase usabanc.com web address, for severalmichael j. brown-8/18/1999
1846 Ok, I get it: marketwatch.newsalert.com This seems like a small stumbling bloKevin McKenzie-8/18/1999
1845 Check this out! U.S. Bancorp Sues Over Web Address Associated Press Online - bullmart-8/18/1999
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News