SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends
MARKET INDEX TECHNICAL ANALYSIS - MITA
An SI Board Since June 1999
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
19219 347 0
Emcee:  J.T. Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
18819No, I was referring to JT's bullish call at the beginning of the year, Not yHawk-3/25/2005
18818I am a bear on the market, I don't know what you think I am predicting.Lizzie Tudor-3/24/2005
18817Geez, this market looks nothing like what you have been predicting.Hawk-3/24/2005
18816TA Books I've compiled a full list here home.netcom.com Technical Analysis Kirk ©-3/21/2005
18815My question I'm sure has been answered many times, but I'm new, and havebrit2-3/20/2005
18814What are some non-option/futures trading vehicles to short: the sp500 the dow 30chuck weir-2/10/2005
18813From JT JT quoted in Barron's Newspaper this week again. Lead MarketWatch adad69-1/30/2005
18812good call on the shake and bake.SGJ-1/4/2005
18811The art form of trading has always been knowing which indicators to use at what Geoff Altman-1/4/2005
18810Jt has his own edge, he has been consistent in his manner and his methods. I coudvdw©-1/4/2005
18809dvdw, my internet connection drowned yesterday... Happens when it rains around hGeoff Altman-1/4/2005
18808I have to agree with Geoff. JT's thread is a long open archive....for anyodvdw©-1/3/2005
18807I have a rising wedge forming in the $BTK with concommitant flattening of momentCasaubon-1/3/2005
18806Oh please........ I've been lurking here for years and I don't find JT Geoff Altman-1/2/2005
18805oops duplicate, how did that happen? I am certain I pushed the post button onlyLizzie Tudor-1/2/2005
18804well, we were not talking about 2000 now were we? I have to say, the shorts areLizzie Tudor-1/2/2005
18803well, we were not talking about 2000 now were we? I have to say, the shorts areLizzie Tudor-1/2/2005
18802and u r thin-skinned JT. Anybody questions anything -- and I mean anything you yard_man-1/2/2005
18801>>The real problem with 01-02 was that there were no new companies, new pryard_man-1/2/2005
18800Bernie Schaeffer has been pretty right on with his tech calls. If he's bearLizzie Tudor-1/2/2005
18799Effective with this last post, I am taking a 2 month hiatus and sabbatical fromJ.T.-1/2/2005
18798Since it has been claimed that I ridiculed Bernie's 2004 market prediction,J.T.-1/1/2005
18797Tippet- Your message here is what set me off: <i>you've ridiculed BeJ.T.-1/1/2005
18796why so testy? I remember you holding long all the way down in 2002 with signifiyard_man-1/1/2005
18795Here are the first words out of your post 18,790: <i>you've <B>J.T.-1/1/2005
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):