Stock-Picking Challenge | Stock Discussion Forums

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes
Stock-Picking Challenge

An SI Board Since January 2001

Posts	SubjectMarks	Bans
2402	53	0

Emcee: Scott Lux	Type: Unmoderated

Introduction Compact

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):

Reply	Message Preview	From	Recs	Posted
1902	What part of "<b>was</b> not part of this contest" don'	Jon Tara	-	2/9/2001
1901	It's not even a portolio-picking contest. In a portfolio-picking contest, y	Jon Tara	-	2/9/2001
1900	I said that he did not change his mind. I said that admitting that he had it wro	Michael Olds	-	2/9/2001
1899	This is crazy! The two different portfolios did not perform exactly the same! A	Michael Olds	-	2/9/2001
1898	It's not a stock-picking contest, in spite of the contest name. It's a	Souze	-	2/9/2001
1897	No, Michael, Scott DID change his mind. That is clear from this statement: &quo	Jon Tara	-	2/9/2001
1896	A MUST READ Stock Shares Cost Value Percentage Gain A	Dale	-	2/9/2001
1895	Not only is the contest not "bogus" because it uses the SI percent gai	Michael Olds	-	2/9/2001
1894	Yea, it's bogus. But it's probably all they are in a position to do at t	Jon Tara	-	2/9/2001
1893	Scott, does this mean you have changed your mind? Remember this answer you gave	Dale	-	2/9/2001
1892	The rules as they are stated are completely unambiguous, if you could not figure	Tim McCormick	-	2/9/2001
1891	>Why not just have everyone adjust the number of shares in their portfolios s	Amit Ghate	-	2/9/2001
1890	<B>I realize that this takes into account the cost of the portfolio which	Kirk ©	-	2/9/2001
1889	Ah, then that makes more sense.	Sarkie	-	2/8/2001
1888	It is for the day. A few people set up two separate portfolios. There are over t	Scott Lux	-	2/8/2001
1887	Can we have an overall winner/losers list as well? Thanks	Paul Ma	-	2/8/2001
1886	must be for the day as that is what i am up for the day, but am down overall 9.8	Barney	-	2/8/2001
1885	It may make it easier, but that don't make it logical, reasonable or fair.	KZAP	-	2/8/2001
1884	Huh? How can they be in there twice? Is this for the day or overall?	Sarkie	-	2/8/2001
1883	Good Evening, Here are todays winners and losers... And just a few quick notes	Scott Lux	-	2/8/2001
1882	Well it does make it easier for SI to calculate winners/losers, and they are goi	Paul Ma	-	2/8/2001
1881	"I realize that this takes into account the cost of the portfolio which was	Jon Tara	-	2/8/2001
1880	Another question. Did you do that while you were under the weather?	Sarkie	-	2/8/2001
1879	Doppler, Nice compiling of that list... Does the doppler screen show the lows	Neenny	-	2/8/2001
1878	Good Afternoon, I wanted to clarify a few of the rules going forward. First, to	Scott Lux	-	2/8/2001

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):