SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech
Anthony Returned the Donation
An SI Board Since May 2000
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
445 29 0
Emcee:  MaryinRed Type:  Moderated
Introduction Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
195 You twisted everything I said, I said that we could not SHORT a stock down becaeims2000-5/28/2000
194 eom: did you get a check back? thx..MIRMaryinRed-5/28/2000
193 <i> But if you look at the vast majority of our picks, the go down and stMaryinRed-5/28/2000
192 <i>None of the donors want to be identified on the internet and the refugusername-5/28/2000
191 I am long EDIG. Have been long EDIG since April 99 thanks to Joe Copia's tMaryinRed-5/28/2000
190 Take a look at the majority of Anthony's picks. Did they pop back up after eims2000-5/28/2000
189 Why do you post about EDIG? I really dont understand the line of questioning. Meims2000-5/28/2000
188 amr, in his narrow minded way, often referred to my picks as being "pump aSmiling Bob-5/28/2000
187 I will repeat myself....strategically, if you need upticks... shouldn't youMaryinRed-5/28/2000
186 Mary, honestly think about this for a bit. There is an uptick rule. It sucks foeims2000-5/28/2000
185 rhansen: 1) why respond to the barrage of positive posts...? If it is going dMaryinRed-5/28/2000
184 rruff, we can't calmly come over everytime and say a. b. and c. because theeims2000-5/28/2000
183 Basically three reasons I know of... 1. Because we are responding to the barageims2000-5/28/2000
182 MIR, <i>The question was that the money Matt collected while Tony was ouPluvia-5/28/2000
181 rhansen....question: why does the private site....even post picks on SI? I haMaryinRed-5/28/2000
180 <i>I never said that I was right 110% of the time. Probably about 80%.<rrufff-5/28/2000
179 I never said that I was right 110% of the time. Probably about 80%. It also takeims2000-5/28/2000
178 <i>We are simply better at figuring out what that price is than you, thatrrufff-5/28/2000
177 Pluvia... I don't think there is a question that Tony gave away money whileMaryinRed-5/28/2000
176 I want to make one thing clear concerning the questions of "where" thPluvia-5/28/2000
175 Wolff: actually...I think I wrote that post....lol.. I really trusted Tony...MaryinRed-5/28/2000
174 Auric: How frequently do you pull that stunt (<i>i.e.</i>, making u24601-5/28/2000
173 Just looking at old posts...I thought that one...went to the street....MIRMaryinRed-5/28/2000
172 Actually what is mind boggling to me is why the US Congress does not give the SSir Auric Goldfinger-5/28/2000
171 You need some sleep.Shoot1st-5/28/2000
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News