SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics
Stop the War!
An SI Board Since March 2003
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
21614 34 0
Emcee:  PartyTime Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
19514<a tactical weapon to disrupt (US) communication> Exactly, nothing that e49thMIMOMander-7/20/2003
19513Ouch, what a dilemma c-span.org49thMIMOMander-7/20/2003
19512Koval Kost-Cost Occupational costs in terms of dollars and lives, especially tho49thMIMOMander-7/20/2003
19511<i>By the time boats get to the ship the flag was knocked off by one Lazarus_Long-7/20/2003
19510<i>yes I did and yes US said no.</i> I still await proof of this. &Lazarus_Long-7/20/2003
19509Maybe you better reread that info. It cuts YOU pretty deeply. Message 19127264Lazarus_Long-7/20/2003
19508OK. We're not talking current military communications technology; we'rLazarus_Long-7/20/2003
19507What we should not forget, in the face of the tragic death of Dr. Kelly, is thatRaymond Duray-7/20/2003
19506I never expected that "Dr Senior Lab Rat" would change his mind becausAK2004-7/20/2003
19505As previously posted on this thread and apparently not read by the moron known arrufff-7/20/2003
19504re: <i>QPSK</i> is not it digital freq modulation with 2bits/4 phaseAK2004-7/20/2003
19503LL re: <i>That assumes they did not intend to attack Americans</i> cAK2004-7/20/2003
19502re: <i>HEY, ALBERT! DIDN'T YOU SAY THAT, WHEN THE US WAS ASKED WHETHERAK2004-7/20/2003
19501<i>if you indeed imply that when israelis decided to abandon americans oncLazarus_Long-7/20/2003
19500<i>only from theoretical stand point</i> You sure about that? jttmaLazarus_Long-7/20/2003
19499Say what? II <i>three hours before the attack occurred, Israeli Navy HeaLazarus_Long-7/20/2003
19498re: <i>A blank window with no text is all I get.</i> just checked thAK2004-7/20/2003
19497what game? Just because I know that you are an idiot that does not necessarily iAK2004-7/20/2003
19496LL re: <i>Say what?</i> 1)You have to read the messages in order. 2)AK2004-7/20/2003
19495re: <i>LPOS, that's BS, you can jam sufficiently to disrupt the communAK2004-7/20/2003
19494Say what? <i>However one of the airborne platforms <deleted> had coLazarus_Long-7/20/2003
19493Game's over LPOS, you lost. jttmabjttmab-7/20/2003
19492re: <i>I didn't say that it had to be jamming through noise. But besidAK2004-7/20/2003
19491<i>jamming works as a tactical weapon to disrupt communication and/or certjttmab-7/20/2003
19490<i>you can not get to it or you ignore it as a part of conspiracy?</i&gLazarus_Long-7/20/2003
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News