SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Biotech / Medical
Apricus Biosciences
An SI Board Since September 2014
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
2026 18 0 APRI
Emcee:  mokelumne river Type:  Moderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
1976Ok, What was the erratic trading about today? Old BoarOldBoar-6/23/2016
1975Even 56 cents is a ridiculously oversold price, but it is better than 32 cents. mokelumne river-6/23/2016
1974Hey PR, I haven't exactly been posting up a storm. However, I agree that thmokelumne river-6/22/2016
1973Just lost interest in APRI I think mate. I just noticed we had over a million sphoenix_rising-6/22/2016
1972>Where is everyone? Waiting for some event that will spark a little bump in mokelumne river-6/21/2016
1971Geez, even the "other" Board is silent. No bashers, no pumpers. Where OldBoar-6/20/2016
1970Of no consequence, short interest at the end of May was reported at 2,635,162, omokelumne river-6/10/2016
1969yes James, it's still systemic and still a PDE5, years away if ever, also coeico20-5/31/2016
1968Good point Eman on the safety issues of skin application of PDE5s. The FDA mighmokelumne river-5/31/2016
1967good find apl, speaks to the safety, and that's the only issue with FDA at teico20-5/31/2016
1966ncbi.nlm.nih.govapriluv-5/31/2016
1965Interesting article. I find it curious that avoiding the digestive system wouldmokelumne river-5/30/2016
1964Possible competition for the future dailymail.co.ukphoenix_rising-5/30/2016
1963I don't think I posted short interest for the settlement date of May 13. Wemokelumne river-5/30/2016
1962I agree that it makes sense to raise more money (e.g., $10M instead of $5M) as imokelumne river-5/22/2016
1961Maybe an offering to raise $3M-$5M could wait until the NDA submittal as ApricusMirror Image-5/22/2016
1960> I believe he (Denner) is holding his position and will be taking advantage mokelumne river-5/22/2016
1959He DOES have more control than we do and he choose not to use it for change. EitMirror Image-5/22/2016
1958James, Ok, thanks. But, only problem is this makes one of my basic assumptions OldBoar-5/22/2016
1957OB/RVL, one look at the vote totals and it is clear how Denner voted. Denner ismokelumne river-5/21/2016
1956Ok, So DG on the "other" board, pointed out that Denner supported KleaOldBoar-5/21/2016
1955good points MI, thanks looking foward to the summaryeico20-5/21/2016
1954Cash Flow positive ( by end of next year ), I think it's very possible! But Mirror Image-5/20/2016
1953MI, can you give us your opinion on Apri's ability to show a cash flow posieico20-5/20/2016
1952Ditto for me OB.I was so confident when Denner jumped in so strong that I continoldcoach19-5/18/2016
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News