SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech
OAKLEY- NYSE:OO
An SI Board Since October 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
1383 7 0 OO
Emcee:  stockvalinvestor Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
208 Here's the official news release from Oakley: IRVINE, CALIF. (March 3) BUSrainman-3/3/1997
207 This weekend I visited the local sunglass retailer in Irvine, CA (where Oakley rainman-3/3/1997
206 To All: "Irvine, Calif.-Based Oakley Ships New Line of Sunglasses, Saves Ms. Baby Boomer-3/3/1997
205 Just in case you didn't see my earlier post.....Sunglass Hut has a central Brian C. Lund-3/2/1997
204 I stopped by Sunglass Hut in my area (Southern California) and the sales woman CLAUDE JOHNSON-3/2/1997
203 The X metals were released February 28. Jannard would have lost incentive monecapitalistbeatnik-3/1/1997
202 Michael, You've got it exactly right. It's anyones guess how Oakley Peter Longerich-3/1/1997
201 I spoke to my broker today and he seems to think the don't have all their dIN_GOD_I_TRUST-2/28/1997
200 I look at the last five years when comparing growth to PE as well as one year fcapitalistbeatnik-2/28/1997
199 Steve, I asked the company the same question and she said that they wanted morCLAUDE JOHNSON-2/28/1997
198 Thanks Peter. I understand your point. A stable company with consistent growtMichael Collins-2/28/1997
197 James, You must have made your post while I was typing mine. I agree 100% wiPeter Longerich-2/28/1997
196 Michael, Bye the way, I apologize for being a little rough on you with my dog Peter Longerich-2/28/1997
195 Your analysis is more rational than TA. PE less than growth is one of my main capitalistbeatnik-2/28/1997
194 Michael, Many investors use a general rule of thum: If the P/E is less than thPeter Longerich-2/28/1997
193 Peter, I appreciate your honesty! Could you tell me what is wrong with my thMichael Collins-2/28/1997
192 Michael This is the most ridiculous analysis I have ever heard of. I prefer Peter Longerich-2/28/1997
191 To all: Tell if me if this valuation and strategy appears reasonble. Under theMichael Collins-2/28/1997
190 Putting the TA fight aside..... I have actually been interested in X-Metal'Brian C. Lund-2/27/1997
189 Has there been any advertising or news of this product release? If it wasn'IN_GOD_I_TRUST-2/27/1997
188 Stop losses are for craven investors who dont know why they bought the stock incapitalistbeatnik-2/27/1997
187 Steve, According to Rene in Investor Relations, the X-metals will appear in seCLAUDE JOHNSON-2/27/1997
186 I might listen to a technical analyst if I ever found one who had a better yearcapitalistbeatnik-2/27/1997
185 No,and I never claimed to be able to make short term predictions with buy and hcapitalistbeatnik-2/27/1997
184 Brian..... Are you finished talking about TA on this thread? There are variouSam-2/27/1997
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News