SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Lucent Technologies (LU)
An SI Board Since May 1997
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
21876 377 0 LU
Emcee:  MRE Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
20801Question of the day ... <b>"How long before LUCENT becomes a penny stAnonymous-9/16/2002
20800nytimes.commatt dillabough-9/15/2002
20799Could it be that the size of the decline can in some way be in part because LU fTechplayer-9/15/2002
20798Excuses!... Excuses!... Excuses!... Excuses!... etc.,... etc.,... etc.,... etAnonymous-9/13/2002
20797That assumes Nortel's 10% estimated decline stays at a 10% decline when it isylvester80-9/13/2002
20796No matter how spun, a 25% seq drop in rev for a company the size of LU is a disaKevin Rose-9/13/2002
20795<b>France Telecom announces huge loss; Cuts funds of German Mobilcom wirelsylvester80-9/13/2002
20794The revenue miss is primarily due to wireless cap ex declines IMO. Read the sprisylvester80-9/13/2002
20793Sprint lowered subscriber growth by half. With more than half of their revenues sylvester80-9/13/2002
20792You are clueless Kenneth. 100% clueless. I see you never responded to my messagesylvester80-9/13/2002
207911) STC and T-Mobile. Sure, they are not LUcy's customers. I never said they DiB-9/13/2002
20790<i>What I was trying to suggest was that Verizon might have delayed its CDslacker711-9/13/2002
20789DiB, I think Lucent has publicly stated that they have given up GSM1900 network scratchmyback-9/13/2002
20788You are correct, one customer default cannot be the only explanation for the revDiB-9/13/2002
20787DiB, customer financing default (by LEAP?) is one thing, but I think one customescratchmyback-9/13/2002
20786scratch, we are talking about "...charges associated with a significant cuDiB-9/13/2002
20785FWIW... Just bought 1,000 at 1.38 and have orders to buy 1,000 at 1.24 and 1,00Rob C.-9/13/2002
20784Lucent losing market share to Cisco, Ericsson, Alcatel and Nortel. lightreadingKenneth E. Phillipps-9/13/2002
20783<i>Is LEAP wireless the customer who didn't pay?</i> I guess LEscratchmyback-9/13/2002
20782Could be, although I did not know that they can be considered as "significaDiB-9/13/2002
20781Is LEAP wireless the customer who didn't pay?Kenneth E. Phillipps-9/13/2002
2078009:13 ET Bernstein sees value in select network equipment co's : Bernstein smatt dillabough-9/13/2002
20779Remember Bernstein saying the market would pick up in the last half of 02 and LuKenneth E. Phillipps-9/13/2002
20778It wasn't me! I pay my bills. It will soon be time to make another purchasAnonymous-9/13/2002
20777>...a significant customer financing default this month... Does anybody haveDiB-9/13/2002
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News