SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Lucent Technologies (LU)
An SI Board Since May 1997
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
21876 377 0 LU
Emcee:  MRE Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
20851That would be impossible as it was a stock deal. If memory serves... the deal waDavid Hansen-9/18/2002
20850And the workforce is probably still top-heavy. Amazing the management load theyGeorge the Greek-9/18/2002
20849Here I was, reading the backlog, and ... and .... you took my line! :-) I was aGeorge the Greek-9/18/2002
20848<i>Excuses!... Excuses!... Excuses!... Excuses!... etc.,... etc.,... etc.,George the Greek-9/18/2002
20847<This stock should be between $3 and $4 right now, and headed towards $6, >posthumousone-9/17/2002
20846<can not last for more than another 6 months without some major disruption inBWAC-9/17/2002
20845Telecommunications Reform Needed to Protect Consumers, SBC President Bill Daley sylvester80-9/17/2002
20844Exactly! So there isn't one. They are all in the same boat. So either every sylvester80-9/17/2002
20843Whatever... a basher who comes here ranting and taunting with no position one wasylvester80-9/17/2002
20842O/T RMBS?? heh.. Sylvester, I have never owned rambus for more then 1-2 days Paul A-9/17/2002
20841Yep, and a slew of others. I think they paid like 24 billion for Ascend! And nowDolfan-9/17/2002
20840Yes.BWAC-9/17/2002
20839refresh my memory...ascend bought cascade and then lucent bought ascend?????matt gray-9/17/2002
20838Pretty good chance LU will get booted out of the S&P now that it's almosCoffeePot-9/17/2002
20837All of them are woefully behind. They've been behind since the day they addeBWAC-9/17/2002
20836<i>Lucent is woefully behind of shaving costs</i> Which of the compsylvester80-9/17/2002
20835No you are not. You are only posting one post out of context. I have done lots osylvester80-9/17/2002
20834>Sad as it is, IF Lucent intends to be a going concern they must shut about hDiB-9/17/2002
20833LOL, never have owned this stock but getting mighty tempted. Just pointing out Bridge Player-9/17/2002
20832The linkage between the manufactures and the operating companies is undeniable. matt gray-9/17/2002
20831The banks own Lucent until the debt is paid down or until they can cut another 4BWAC-9/17/2002
20830personally I did fine on qwest. Similar situation, the market discounted the shamatt gray-9/17/2002
20829You are thinking of the double run from $1.40 to $2.95. You missed that one. I&#sylvester80-9/17/2002
20828Is it too late too jump on the LU train that was leaving the station! Hope I doposthumousone-9/17/2002
20827What's amazing is that nobody wants them even at those small market caps. I sylvester80-9/17/2002
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News