SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes
Can SI Members Really Manipulate Stocks?
An SI Board Since July 1998
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
461 18 0
Emcee:  Jeffrey S. Mitchell Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
211 I look forward to seeing who turns out to be right, in our little debate. You,Just My Opinion-8/2/1998
210 I have already shown that your interpretation of my post concerning Kahn was inJust My Opinion-8/2/1998
209 Then why do you respond at all? Of course the fact that you refuse to engage inMama Bear-8/2/1998
208 Assume anything you like. I have no requirement to respond to what I considerJust My Opinion-8/2/1998
207 anyone, you are free to guide your behavior in anyway that you choose. It does Mama Bear-8/2/1998
206 Gee, it took a while to find this from Flemingeh happy.tdyc.comPatrick Slevin-8/2/1998
205 I already said that you know. Post whatever you want, if you are right, then nJust My Opinion-8/2/1998
204 So, basically you just refuse to answer any kind of rational questions? Is thatMama Bear-8/2/1998
203 You missed... steve-8/2/1998
202 marcos, isn't tonto the spanish word for fool? Barb Mama Bear-8/2/1998
201 Flamingeh must be foreign as well, ay? He uses "eh" instead of "Patrick Slevin-8/2/1998
200 anyone, again, it is you who is twisting everything to suit your end. I do not Mama Bear-8/2/1998
199 Okay.. You win, post whatever you want. . You know. . You make the rules. . YoJust My Opinion-8/2/1998
198 <when is the SEC going to make it alright for anyone to short bb-stocks. WhPatrick Slevin-8/2/1998
197 anyone, that's pretty feeble, I read exactly what you said. It is your probMama Bear-8/2/1998
196 You read into it what you <i>wanted</i> to read into it. That is yJust My Opinion-8/2/1998
195 In post #185 you said <i>"Why does anybody think that people who posMama Bear-8/2/1998
194 Barb: Show me where I posted that that guy posted on SI. HahahahahahahahahaJust My Opinion-8/2/1998
193 Douglas, the issues that many argue vis a vis publishing on the web are nothingMama Bear-8/2/1998
192 It is most interesting that you ignore things like <i>"The SEC also Mama Bear-8/2/1998
191 Hey Barb, I think an important issue here is will there be precidents set conDJRoss-8/2/1998
190 anyone, the thing that you don't understand is that "fraud" occurMama Bear-8/2/1998
189 Jeffrey, Osicom Tech and Presstek are two other companies that have filed suitsMama Bear-8/2/1998
188 anyone, it is totally unfair for you to claim that I have tried to "distorMama Bear-8/2/1998
187 C.K., how about if an actor on the stage shouts Fire! in the context of the plaMama Bear-8/2/1998
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):