SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
XM Satellite Radio Holdings Inc. (XMSR)
An SI Board Since October 1999
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
3386 84 0 XMSR
Emcee:  HiSpeed Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
2211Roberts has about 70,000 shares of XMSR.GVTucker-2/17/2006
2210<i> Isn't 1.8% of 10 million 180,000, not 1.8 million? </i> CHUpcstel-2/17/2006
2209If you had serious disagreements with the board about the company's policiesSam Citron-2/17/2006
2208Tim His deal calls for $400 Million in cash over 5 years. In addition, he justi-node-2/17/2006
2207<i> In April, 06 you'll see that content expenses have increased by abTimF-2/17/2006
2206I don't think I've ever seen a public director's letter like that. rrufff-2/17/2006
2205Stern will show up mostly as increased content expenses beginning this year. Ini-node-2/17/2006
220410:37 ET Sirius Satellite (SIRI): 5.47 -0.18: Sirius Satellite Radio's lsixty2nds-2/17/2006
2203Do any of you guys know how SIRI expenses Stern, ie where it show up? Will we noDaveMG-2/17/2006
2202>>>A so-called "blended" or "fully loaded" churn meSirius_Rich-2/17/2006
2201Pierce Roberts resignation letter: LETTER, DATED FEBRUARY 13, 2006 Exhibit 17.Sam Citron-2/17/2006
220010:13 XMSR XM Satellite downgraded to Average from Above Average at Caris (23.2sixty2nds-2/17/2006
219909:47 XMSR XM Satellite downgrade details (23.45 -0.53) -Update- As we notesixty2nds-2/17/2006
219809:15 XMSR XM Satellite downgraded to Hold from Buy at Sanders Morris (23.98 )sixty2nds-2/17/2006
2197<i>It would make more sense, it seems to me to look at churn from those whi-node-2/17/2006
2196Is the " blended" ie total churn number actually 18% because that is aDaveMG-2/17/2006
2195>>> The company expects SAC per gross subscriber addition to approach $i-node-2/17/2006
2194Isn't 1.8% of 10 million 180,000, not 1.8 million? I am going to check on iDaveMG-2/17/2006
2193<Why would there be a merger?> one company with ALL the subs....ALL the cMichael Hart-2/17/2006
219207:10 SIRI Sirius Satellite misses by a penny; reaffirms sub guidance; issues Fsixty2nds-2/17/2006
2191No offense taken. Direct works for me. Your case is well stated.sixty2nds-2/17/2006
2190<I>XM states that they do not count those in a new car trial period in thei-node-2/17/2006
2189>> Suicidal spending by your competition is nothing to celebrate. I thinki-node-2/17/2006
2188"So, XM spent $70 million in Q4 to "stay in the ballpark" in the pcstel-2/16/2006
2187<i> I suspect each competitor will end up merged/acquired with a conventipcstel-2/16/2006
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):