SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends
Bob Brinker: Market Savant & Radio Host
An SI Board Since December 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
42834 221 0
Emcee:  wooden ships Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 40 | Next 40 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
22242I find it remarkably foolish that anyone, obviously I don't mean you, would Elmer Phud-7/19/2006
22241Hi ifishiam - you said ""Good money".....Hi Kirk". Well, I tomflint-7/19/2006
22240No Problemo. And I know we're all grateful to you for supporting the economyMath Junkie-7/19/2006
22239Math, Queen, Honeytres... I have been looking for a board to discuss Brinker’s rtomflint-7/19/2006
22238"It's the same cast of losers except in much closer quarters." Iqueen97000-7/19/2006
22237Queen wisely said to Willy.... "Don't worry, I may not be around much shres-7/19/2006
22236hiya, cheat! cheat, aka stockalot said-- "it seems we have two "new&ququeen97000-7/19/2006
22235Mr pigshit! Let me be the first to welcome you here. What a coincidence--your oHoney_Bee-7/19/2006
22234shres said: "LOL Fahren but I wouldn't place to much faith in what afahrenheit451-7/18/2006
22233 Where is my hearty welcome Math Junkie? What am I, chopped liver? Maybe Fakepigstuff-7/18/2006
22232Today I talked to two stockbrokers I know. Neither one of them has ever heard ofshres-7/18/2006
22231You bring up a great point. It seems we have two "new" posters in the stockalot-7/18/2006
22230queen9700 You said: "Lets not forget who fired the first salvo here."fahrenheit451-7/18/2006
22229honey said "" Brinker-bots will travel anywhere to defend their guy. Lqueen97000-7/18/2006
22228First of all I would like to thank shres for answering my question. He doesn'fahrenheit451-7/18/2006
22227You are right, Math...I went back and read your post more carefully and can see Honey_Bee-7/18/2006
22226I see that Ms Queen joined SI today, and her first post was to throw in with thHoney_Bee-7/18/2006
22225Thank you math. I don't disagree that it's ok to be reminded, I just donqueen97000-7/18/2006
22224Although we disagree on this point, welcome to the thread! It's good to see Math Junkie-7/18/2006
22223"<i>Now I'm going to get a earful about why they shouldn't geMath Junkie-7/18/2006
22222"That's not what I mean. I wish they'd drop this obsession with thaqueen97000-7/18/2006
22221Halleluiah! I will mark this day in my calendar!Math Junkie-7/18/2006
22220<i>Bob Brinker, who is the topic of this thread, is a very controversial sElmer Phud-7/18/2006
22219"<i>God I wish you guys would give it a rest.</i>" This tMath Junkie-7/18/2006
22218Ok, then maybe I did misuderstand if we agree that Brinker was both dishonest instockalot-7/18/2006
22217Math_Junkie: "<i>My guess is that he expected people who were still hMath Junkie-7/18/2006
22216God, I sure hope you guys and girls don't give it a rest.pigstuff-7/18/2006
22215God I wish you guys would give it a rest.Elmer Phud-7/18/2006
22214It would appear you recognize dishonesty but have to come up with an alibi that stockalot-7/18/2006
22213>>You seem to know more about him that I do Everybody seems to know <pigstuff-7/18/2006
22212"<i>In Brinker's April Newsletter he said NOTHING about the QQQQsMath Junkie-7/18/2006
22211Math says: "According to what people have written about his answer, he refstockalot-7/18/2006
22210"<i>EXXXXCCCCUUUUSSSSEEEE Me! But Brinker NEVER put those QQQQ's Math Junkie-7/18/2006
22209Math Junkie said: "According to what people have written about his answer, Honey_Bee-7/18/2006
22208Hey fahranheit, What did I say about Bob Brinker in my post? You seem to know shres-7/18/2006
22207You should check your facts more carefully. "<i>Clicking on your namMath Junkie-7/18/2006
22206Clicking on your name reveals that you have nearly 5,000 posts and have had TWOstockalot-7/18/2006
22205"<i>Your pal Math Junkie has over 5,000 posts here and has run moderaMath Junkie-7/18/2006
22204Another advantage that this site has over Yahoo Message Boards is the fact that Honey_Bee-7/17/2006
22203I've been here for going on 5 years and made 300 some posts. The guy you gastockalot-7/17/2006
Previous 40 | Next 40 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):