SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes
The Perils and Pitfalls of Investing With "Friends"
An SI Board Since October 2004
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
377 57 0
Emcee:  Bill Ulrich Type:  Moderated
Introduction Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
227Fair enough. I can see where my response may have appeared glib, since that was SI Dave-10/30/2004
226I agree with "no software solution". Not fully 100% there on "no Bill Ulrich-10/30/2004
225<'reading this stuff just makes me see red"> I just went over theCaptain Jack-10/30/2004
224It is ludirous, but I thought the position you took with Poet was perhaps too glBill Ulrich-10/30/2004
223Exactly! It's sort of an inside joke/point. <i>"I prefer your oriBill Ulrich-10/30/2004
222reading this stuff just makes me see red mikilo.image.pbase.comMulhollandDrive-10/29/2004
221"I prefer your original name myself - has much more of a credibility factorSawdusty-10/29/2004
220I prefer your original name myself - has much more of a credibility factor. By tMan on the moon-10/29/2004
219Because "Tastes Like Scammin" was too hard to pronounce. <i>&quBill Ulrich-10/29/2004
218I really expected more from you than this. <i>"Thanks"</i>Tommy Hicks-10/29/2004
217<i>>>So, if this happens again, say some other high-profile member sSI Dave-10/29/2004
216Bill, why did you change your moniker back to that obnoxious cOUSIN gOTTI name? Man on the moon-10/29/2004
215<i>So, if this happens again, say some other high-profile member starts a SI Bob-10/29/2004
214As long as there are suckers there will be conmen(women)to play the game. The rSarkie-10/29/2004
213Followiing precedent, maybe we can expect in the layout next to TLC's editorBill Ulrich-10/29/2004
212<i>>> So in hindsight, it actually was a mass solicitation, but the SI Dave-10/29/2004
211So, if this happens again, say some other high-profile member starts a new and sBill Ulrich-10/29/2004
210I think there are a number of ways you (SI) can respond to what transpired. OneDone, gone.-10/29/2004
209But, individually, if a person had known that he solicited Poet, Michal, the mulBill Ulrich-10/29/2004
208<i>>>I believe this case clearly falls in line with SI's obligatSI Dave-10/29/2004
207To conclude "of course not" is a bit hasty. Because of his presence heBill Ulrich-10/29/2004
206That point doesn't apply, however, because nobody is blaming the "highwBill Ulrich-10/29/2004
205<i>>>A "confidence man" working a room of SI clientele in SI Dave-10/29/2004
204Those avenues aren't nearly as easy to use in a systematic and predatory wayBill Ulrich-10/29/2004
203I would suggest that judging what might very well be a widespread and long-term Poet-10/29/2004
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News