LUMM - Lumenon Innovative Lightwave Technology Inc.

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks
LUMM - Lumenon Innovative Lightwave Technology Inc.

An SI Board Since February 1999

Posts	SubjectMarks	Bans	Symbol
2484	45	0	LUMM

Emcee: Currency	Type: Unmoderated

Introduction Market Data Compact

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):

Reply	Message Preview	From	Recs	Posted
2284	<i>Are you sure it wasn't 23.445 million US sec.gov; Your link is to	pat mudge	-	5/28/2001
2283	The burn rate is quite a bit less than $5MM US. This is an anomaly created by t	Greg Thornton	-	5/28/2001
2282	<i>"the people who brought LUMM[E] to light are from the Vancouver St	Greg Thornton	-	5/27/2001
2281	but our performance is in the public record -- well over 20% YOY since 1987 -- a	Peter Sherman	-	5/27/2001
2280	the people who brought LUMM[E] to light are from the Vancouver Stock Exchange if	Peter Sherman	-	5/27/2001
2279	Thanks for sharing. And thanks for caring. Up here a PM is a Prime Minister. Dow	Don Johnstone	-	5/27/2001
2278	<i>At the beginning of the March Q, they had 5,713M in cash and subsequent	richroni	-	5/27/2001
2277	At the beginning of the March Q, they had 5,713M in cash and subsequently added	pat mudge	-	5/27/2001
2276	<i>The queen of copy/paste.</i> Yep. From deep withing SEC documen	pat mudge	-	5/27/2001
2275	Peter, Lumenon is Montreal based, not Vancouver based. No reverse split in its	Greg Thornton	-	5/27/2001
2274	==understand== What's to understand? Buy high, sell low = the story of my	Don Johnstone	-	5/26/2001
2273	actually DJ, I really can not understand your addiction to this Vancouver-based,	Peter Sherman	-	5/26/2001
2272	Another vote for Pat. Terrific. What is she running for? Ah, never mind, I'l	Don Johnstone	-	5/26/2001
2271	Yes, Pat, thank you. You are thorough. Nobody's better.I believe everything	Don Johnstone	-	5/26/2001
2270	i can vouch for pat - if she researched it, it was thorough and comprehensive -	Peter Sherman	-	5/26/2001
2269	<i>Pat Mudge? I thought she was a knowledgeable researcher at one time, NN	pat mudge	-	5/26/2001
2268	<i>I think they are secretly working on one of those sock puppets. </i	pat mudge	-	5/26/2001
2267	==In brief, what does LUMM make and to whom do they sell it?== In brief 'no	Don Johnstone	-	5/25/2001
2266	no, pop suckits	Ben Wa	-	5/25/2001
2265	I think they are secretly working on one of those sock puppets.	Kent Rattey	-	5/25/2001
2264	Don, I have a serious question about LUMM. I've watch from afar and feel b	opalapril	-	5/25/2001
2263	==The feeling is mutual.== VBG DJ	Don Johnstone	-	5/24/2001
2262	<i>What would we do without you? I'd like to find out. </i> T	pat mudge	-	5/23/2001
2261	Pumping but not dumping! Never sold a share. Can't stay away, eh, Pat. In	Don Johnstone	-	5/23/2001
2260	<i>What record? Your foul mouthed posting record here on SI or your police	pat mudge	-	5/23/2001

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):