SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
GX Investors Thread
An SI Board Since August 2001
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
586 21 0 GX
Emcee:  qveauriche Type:  Moderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
236The way I see it, GX has done the hard technical heavy lifting by getting its necarranza2-8/31/2001
235That's what I meant. Thanks. Jopawa is correct; cash flow is negative, in carranza2-8/31/2001
234<<They have targeted the top Multi-national companies who need data traffiSawtooth-8/31/2001
233Mq, I have a feeling I know where you are going with the rant, but keep in mindDWB-8/31/2001
232DWB, I did not like reading this [even though on a superficial reading it soundsMaurice Winn-8/31/2001
231k maxwell: A quote for your consideration. "Markets can remain irrationalDlphcOracl-8/31/2001
230<< Cash flow positive? Under what rules did you define that? >> I aDukeCrow-8/31/2001
229<i>It seems to be able to pay its debt, is cash flow positive, and I can&#jopawa-8/30/2001
228GX as an investment boils down to two questions you have to answer... 1) Will GDWB-8/30/2001
227Think you'll do alright with GX probably 1st half next year sometime. I am Jane4IceCream-8/30/2001
226I don't currently have a position in GX but I'm considering one. Seems carranza2-8/30/2001
225Unfortunately <maybe fortunately for those buying long-term at these prices&gJane4IceCream-8/30/2001
224Institutional and insider ownership seem substantial. It appears that they own carranza2-8/30/2001
223One word....... Perception. Well, also...... Insider selling, Institutional sJane4IceCream-8/30/2001
222GX at these prices has to be one of the best long-term value investment opportuncarranza2-8/30/2001
221<I>Roaming Agreements</i> Thanks for the correct term here. Yes, I Theophile-8/30/2001
220Maurice, I got the picture about why GSTRF was a hold. The problem being the exTheophile-8/30/2001
219<<<<Regardless of how crappy the market, ten lower closes in a row ik_maxwell-8/30/2001
218Mq, As a follow up to my last response with the linked message, I went back andDWB-8/30/2001
217Mq, If you are interested in learning more about GX, this is the right place. DWB-8/30/2001
216DJ Holder Registers 1,000,000 of GLOBAL CROSSING LTD (GX) Dow Jones News Servicmatt dillabough-8/30/2001
215<<Global Crossing is I suppose like that too.>> I believe most inveKJ. Moy-8/30/2001
214<<i>Globalstar missed so many execution targets I could not understand Maurice Winn-8/30/2001
213Globalstar missed so many execution targets I could not understand how others stTheophile-8/30/2001
212Hi DWB, I can't recall what chain of links I followed, but in the desolationMaurice Winn-8/30/2001
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):