SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes
The California Energy Crisis - Information & Forum
An SI Board Since January 2001
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
1715 22 0
Emcee:  deepenergyfella Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
240POSTED AT 2:52 AM EDT Friday, April 13 California to blame for energy pricesBearcatbob-4/13/2001
239If CA confiscates power plants, you can probably forget any new private construcDavesM-4/13/2001
238Gina, My dog needs a loan. She has little prospect of ever being able to pay -Bearcatbob-4/13/2001
237Don't discount the possibility of confiscation as an option for the CA stategamesmistress-4/12/2001
236Maybe the State should move to Eastern Time. That way, just as its really gettiDavesM-4/12/2001
235If there is ever talk of confiscation by the government of California the rest oBearcatbob-4/12/2001
234I can see why the Californians want price caps - problem is, they're easy togamesmistress-4/12/2001
233I agree with you on the results of confiscation - the danger is that in CA it cogamesmistress-4/12/2001
232"seizing" businesses has an unhappy connotation incompatible with a frAngler-4/12/2001
231Thanks for the article on electricity trading - very interesting stuff. I must agamesmistress-4/12/2001
230SAN JOSE MERCURY NEWS MARKETPLACE FOR ELECTRICITY SPARKS ONLINE ENERGY TRADING Patricia Trinchero-4/11/2001
229Interesting... Re comment in article: "In the report, the authors also argPonderosa-4/11/2001
228Any comments on this latest "solution" for CA's energy crisis? Cagamesmistress-4/11/2001
227Ponderosa: I would have to say that Nuclear Power plants are the least of all pAngler-4/9/2001
226Zeus: It's pretty hard to move away from the roads that we seem to have takAngler-4/9/2001
225Frankly, it seems pretty clear to me that Americans would rather keep troops in DavesM-4/9/2001
224IMO the US should play a leadership role. Developing nations will look at the UZeuspaul-4/9/2001
223Thanks very much for that link.....it is testimony that has at least a large meaTom Simpson-4/9/2001
222Forewarned was fair warned. AnglerAngler-4/9/2001
221Acutally this situation was upon us last spring (from the Cal ISO website - caliDavesM-4/9/2001
220Tom, here's a recent reference declaring that demand for electricity grew byWWS-4/9/2001
219Well well Sam....fancy running into you here :o) A forum this is.....informativTom Simpson-4/9/2001
218Yep... I just don't get why CA is so opposed to nuclear power. Now, please, Ponderosa-4/8/2001
217Zeuspaul: Wouldn't you say that natural gas is a cleaner burning fuel more Angler-4/8/2001
216<i>The old model will work - until demand exceeds supply</i> The olZeuspaul-4/8/2001
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):